Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832703›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2020

Analysis of neurodevelopmental outcomes of preadolescents born with extremely low weight revealed impairments in multiple developmental domains despite absence of cognitive impairment.

Viena Tommiska, Aulikki Lano, Päivi Kleemola, Liisa Klenberg, Liisa Lehtonen, Tuija Löppönen, Päivi Olsen, Outi Tammela, Vineta Fellman, Finnish ELBW Cohort Study Group (FinELBW)

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Viena TommiskaChildren's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-102X
Aulikki LanoChildren's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland.
Päivi KleemolaChildren's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland.
Liisa KlenbergDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.
Liisa LehtonenDepartment of Paediatrics Turku University Hospital, Turku University Turku Finland.
Tuija LöppönenDepartment of Paediatrics, Unit of Child Neurology University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland.
Päivi OlsenDepartment of Child Neurology Oulu University Hospital Oulu Finland.
Outi TammelaDepartment of Paediatrics Tampere University Hospital, Tampere Center of Child Health Research Tampere Finland.
Vineta FellmanChildren's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland.
Finnish ELBW Cohort Study Group (FinELBW)
University of Helsinki · FIOulu University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsChildren with extremely low-birth weight (ELBW) have a high risk for cognitive, motor, and attention impairments and learning disabilities. Longitudinal follow-up studies to a later age are needed in order to increase understanding of the changes in neurodevelopmental trajectories in targeting timely intervention. The aims of this study were to investigate cognitive and motor outcomes, attention-deficit hyperactivity (ADHD) behaviour, school performance, and overall outcomes in a national cohort of ELBW children at preadolescence, and minor neuromotor impairments in a subpopulation of these children and to compare the results with those of full-term controls. The additional aim was to report the overall outcome in all ELBW infants born at 22 to 26 gestational weeks.

methodsThis longitudinal prospective national cohort study included all surviving ELBW (birth weight <1000 g) children born in Finland in 1996 to 1997. No children were excluded from the study. Perinatal, neonatal, and follow-up data up to the age of 5 years of these children were registered in the national birth register. According to birth register, the study population included all infants born at the age under 27 gestational weeks. At 11 years of age general cognitive ability was tested with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, ADHD behavior evaluated with a report from each child's own teacher (ADHD Rating Scale IV), and school performance with a parental questionnaire. An ELBW subpopulation consisting of a cohort representative children from the two university hospitals from two regions (n = 63) and the age-matched full-term born controls born in Helsinki university hospital (n = 30) underwent Movement Assessment Battery for Children and Touwen neurological examination comprising developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and minor neurological dysfunction (MND), respectively.

resultsOf 206 ELBW survivors 122 (73% of eligible) children and 30 (100%) full-term control children participated in assessments. ELBW children had lower full-scale intellectual quotient than controls (

conclusionAs the majority of the extremely preterm born children had some problems, long-term follow-up is warranted to identify those with special needs and to design individual multidisciplinary support programs.

Indexed as

attention deficit disorderdevelopmental problemsvery preterm infant

Identifiers

PMID32832703
PMCPMC7436176
OpenAlexW3080597744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.