Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832613›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Targeting brain metastases with ultrasmall theranostic nanoparticles, a first-in-human trial from an MRI perspective.

Camille Verry, Sandrine Dufort, Benjamin Lemasson, Sylvie Grand, Johan Pietras, Irène Troprès, Yannick Crémillieux, François Lux, Sébastien Mériaux, Benoit Larrat and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Lanthanide Nanotheranostics in Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Nanomaterials Trigger Functional Anti-Tumoral Responses in Primary Human Immune Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Camille VerryCHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9362-7624
Sandrine DufortNH TherAguix, Meylan, France.
Benjamin LemassonUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0446-3531
Sylvie GrandCHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Johan PietrasIRMaGe, CNRS, INSERM, Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1508-1985
Irène TroprèsIRMaGe, CNRS, INSERM, Université Grenoble Alpes, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5010-6976
Yannick CrémillieuxInstitut des Sciences Moléculaires, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3262-5983
François LuxInstitut Lumière Matière, CNRS, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Sébastien MériauxNeuroSpin, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7430-8348
Benoit LarratNeuroSpin, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Jacques BalossoCHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0714-9003
Géraldine Le DucNH TherAguix, Meylan, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2724-6847
Emmanuel L BarbierUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4952-1240
Olivier TillementInstitut Lumière Matière, CNRS, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCedrat Technologies (France) · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of radiosensitizing nanoparticles with both imaging and therapeutic properties on the same nano-object is regarded as a major and promising approach to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy. Here, we report the MRI findings of a phase 1 clinical trial with a single intravenous administration of Gd-based AGuIX nanoparticles, conducted in 15 patients with four types of brain metastases (melanoma, lung, colon, and breast). The nanoparticles were found to accumulate and to increase image contrast in all types of brain metastases with MRI enhancements equivalent to that of a clinically used contrast agent. The presence of nanoparticles in metastases was monitored and quantified with MRI and was noticed up to 1 week after their administration. To take advantage of the radiosensitizing property of the nanoparticles, patients underwent radiotherapy sessions following their administration. This protocol has been extended to a multicentric phase 2 clinical trial including 100 patients.

Identifiers

PMID32832613
PMCPMC7439298
OpenAlexW3042444813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.