Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832585›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2019

What is optimal in optimal inference?

Gaia Tavoni, Vijay Balasubramanian, Joshua I Gold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Occam's razor guides human decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Organizational Neuroscience of Industrial Adaptive Behavior.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Inference as a fundamental process in behavior.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gaia TavoniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Vijay BalasubramanianDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Joshua I GoldDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Funding

CRCNS: Decision Making in Changing EnvironmentsR01MH115557 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GOLD, JOSHUA I, JOSIC, KRESIMIR · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
Mental, measurement, and model complexity in neuroscienceR01EB026945 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BALASUBRAMANIAN, VIJAY, GOLD, JOSHUA I · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026945NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inferring hidden structure from noisy observations is a problem addressed by Bayesian statistical learning, which aims to identify optimal models of the process that generated the observations given assumptions that constrain the space of potential solutions. Animals and machines face similar "model-selection" problems to infer latent properties and predict future states of the world. Here we review recent attempts to explain how intelligent agents address these challenges and how their solutions relate to Bayesian principles. We focus on how constraints on available information and resources affect inference and propose a general framework that uses benefit(accuracy) and accuracy(cost) curves to assess optimality under these constraints.

Identifiers

PMID32832585
PMCPMC7441787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.