ArticleJournal of diabetes research2020
Evaluation of Foveal and Parafoveal Microvascular Changes Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Type 2 Diabetes Patients without Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy in South Korea.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macular Choriocapillaris and Retinal Microvascular Alterations Across the Prediabetes-Early Type 2 Diabetes Continuum.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Multiparametric OCTA Biomarkers for Classifying Mild Diabetic Retinopathy: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Automated Foveal Avascular Zone Segmentation in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Across Multiple Eye Diseases Using Knowledge Distillation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of optical coherence tomography angiography and pattern and flash electroretinography in diabetes mellitus without retinopathy.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Correlations between Retinal Microvascular Parameters and Clinical Parameters in Young Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Structural and Functional Retinal Changes in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment with and without Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Retinal Vascular Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Diabetic Retinopathy and Cardiovascular Disease: A Literature Review.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023Review
- Central and peripheral changes in the retina and choroid in patients with diabetes mellitus without clinical diabetic retinopathy assessed by ultra-wide-field optical coherence tomography angiography.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Retinal and Corneal Changes Associated with Intraocular Silicone Oil Tamponade.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate foveal and parafoveal microvascular changes in retinal vascular plexuses in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) without clinical diabetic retinopathy (NDR) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in South Korea. We included 64 patients in the NDR group and included 48 healthy control subjects for comparison. All subjects underwent ocular examination with visual acuity and wide-field fundus photos. Foveal and parafoveal vessel density and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area (mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.