ReviewHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2020
International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Review in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of an improved continuous single-layer pancreaticojejunostomy technique in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2026Article
- Radiologically-confirmed dehiscence of the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and implications for technique.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Long-Term Nutritional Benefits of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy Over Open Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Risk factors for postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2023.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: The Robotic Evolution-Transforming Pancreatic Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Comparing Safety and Efficacy: Laparoscopic vs. Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Retrospective analysis of delta hemoglobin and bleeding-related risk factors in pancreaticoduodenectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A bibliometric method applied to the top one hundred cited articles.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Totally laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cysts with hand‑sewn Roux‑en‑Y reconstruction in a pediatric population.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Various retraction techniques for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2024Article
- Short‑ and long‑term outcomes after laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for elderly patients: a propensity score‑matched study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Review
- "Five steps four quadrants" modularizedWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Radiological classification of the Heidelberg triangle and its application in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of the 'Five-Needle' method for pancreatojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: an observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Causes and predictors of unplanned reoperations within 30 days post laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comprehensive analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater in a medium-volume center: a propensity score matching analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Article
- Application of single-layer continuous duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with two figure-of-eight sutures in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceWhile laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is being adopted with increasing enthusiasm worldwide, it is still challenging for both technical and anatomical reasons. Currently, there is no consensus on the technical standards for LPD.
objectiveThe aim of this consensus statement is to guide the continued safe progression and adoption of LPD. EVIDENCE REVIEW: An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Statements were produced upon reviewing the literature and assessed by the members of the expert panel. The literature search and its critical appraisal were limited to articles published in English during the period from 1994 to 2019. The Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials databases were searched, The search strategy included, but was not limited to, the terms 'laparoscopic', 'pancreaticoduodenectomy, 'pancreatoduodenectomy', 'Whipple's operation', and 'minimally invasive surgery'. Reference lists from the included articles were manually checked for any additional studies, which were included when appropriate. Delphi method was used to establish expert consensus and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument was applied to assess the methodological quality and externally validate the final statements. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting at the 1
findingsTwenty-eight international experts from 8 countries constructed the expert panel. Sixteen statements were produced by the members of the expert panel. At least 80% of responders agreed with the majority (80%) of statements. Other than three randomized controlled trials published to date, most evidences were based on level 3 or 4 studies according to the AGREE II-GRS Instrument. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Wuhan international expert consensus meeting on LPD has produced a set of clinical practice statements for the safe development and progression of LPD. LPD is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. More robust randomized controlled trial and registry study are essential to proceed with the assessment of LPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.