Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832428›Full record

ArticleAvicenna journal of medicine

Research attitudes, barriers, and prior experience: Experience from interns working in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Yassar Alamri, Hassan Qahwaji, Sara Saif, Ahmed Abu-Zaid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Avicenna journal of medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yassar AlamriDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Hassan QahwajiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sara SaifDepartment of Emergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Abu-ZaidCollege of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore research productivity and attitudes by Saudi interns. MATERIALS AND

methodsInterns from two hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia were invited to participate in an online survey.

resultsFifty-seven interns responded to the survey. An accurate response rate is not possible because the invitation email reliably reached only a half of all 400 interns. Fifteen interns (26.3%) presented their research findings at a conference, and seven (12.3%) had managed to publish their findings. The main attractions to research were improving prospects of a successful residency/fellowship match (71.7%) and desire to learn more about the research subject (17%).

conclusionMost interns in our sample expressed interest in being involved in research. The driving forces behind such eagerness, however, remain to be explicitly explored-although the majority of the sampled interns cited improved chances for a successful residency/fellowship match as the main reason.

Indexed as

Career choiceinternmedical studentresearchSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID32832428
PMCPMC7414602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.