Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832404›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2020

Detecting tuberculosis in pregnant and postpartum women in Eswatini.

Munyaradzi Pasipamire, Edward Broughton, Mandzisi Mkhontfo, Gugu Maphalala, Batsabile Simelane-Vilane, Samson Haumba

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Best practices for the care of pregnant people living with TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Association ofFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. African laboratory medicine in the time of COVID-19.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Munyaradzi PasipamireResearch and Evaluation, Eswatini National AIDS Programme, Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Eswatini.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-6995
Edward BroughtonResearch and Evaluation, University Research Co. LLC, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8621-7267
Mandzisi MkhontfoUniversity Research Co. LLC, Mbabane, Eswatini.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-9084
Gugu MaphalalaEswatini Health Laboratory Services, Mbabane, Eswatini.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-8405
Batsabile Simelane-VilaneUniversity Research Co. LLC, Mbabane, Eswatini.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-0003
Samson HaumbaUniversity Research Co. LLC, Mbabane, Eswatini.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-1247
Ministry of Health · SZUniversity Research Co (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis diagnosis in pregnancy is complex because tuberculosis symptoms are often masked by physiological symptoms of pregnancy. Untreated tuberculosis in pregnant and postpartum women may lead to maternal morbidity and low birth weight. Tuberculosis in HIV-positive pregnant women increases the risk of maternal and infant mortality.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine tuberculosis prevalence stratified by HIV status and identify screening algorithms that maximise detection of active tuberculosis among pregnant and postpartum women in Eswatini.

methodsWomen were enrolled at antenatal and postnatal clinics in Eswatini for tuberculosis screening and diagnostic investigations from 01 April to 30 November 2015 in a cross-sectional study. Sputum samples were collected from all participants for tuberculosis diagnostic tests (smear microscopy, GeneXpert, MGIT culture). Blood and urine samples were collected from HIV-positive women for cluster-of-differentiation-4 cell count, interferon gamma release assay and tuberculosis lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan tests.

resultsWe enrolled 990 women; 52% were pregnant and 47% were HIV-positive. The prevalence of tuberculosis among HIV-positive pregnant women was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2-7) and among postpartum women it was 1% (95%CI: -1-3). Tuberculosis prevalence was 2% (95%CI: 0-3) in HIV-negative pregnant women and 1% (95%CI: -1-2) in HIV-negative postpartum women. The national tuberculosis symptom screening tool failed to identify women who tested tuberculosis-culture positive.

conclusionRoutine tuberculosis symptom screening alone is insufficient to rule out tuberculosis in pregnant and postpartum women. Only sputum culture maximised the detection of tuberculosis, indicating a need to balance access and cost in developing countries.

Indexed as

EswatiniHIVpostpartum womenpregnant womenTuberculosistuberculosis diagnosistuberculosis screening

Identifiers

PMID32832404
PMCPMC7433265
OpenAlexW3046567814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.