Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832267›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Effects of cost surface uncertainty on current density estimates from circuit theory.

Jeff Bowman, Elizabeth Adey, Siow Y J Angoh, Jennifer E Baici, Michael G C Brown, Chad Cordes, Arthur E Dupuis, Sasha L Newar, Laura M Scott, Kirsten Solmundson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeff BowmanOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Canada.
Elizabeth AdeyTrent University, Peterborough, Canada.
Siow Y J AngohTrent University, Peterborough, Canada.
Jennifer E BaiciTrent University, Peterborough, Canada.
Michael G C BrownTrent University, Peterborough, Canada.
Chad CordesOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Canada.
Arthur E DupuisTrent University, Peterborough, Canada.
Sasha L NewarTrent University, Peterborough, Canada.
Laura M ScottTrent University, Peterborough, Canada.
Kirsten SolmundsonTrent University, Peterborough, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9968-1613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConservation practitioners are often interested in developing land use plans that increase landscape connectivity, which is defined as the degree to which the landscape facilitates or impedes movement among resource patches. Landscape connectivity is often estimated with a cost surface that indicates the varying costs experienced by an organism in moving across a landscape. True, or absolute costs are rarely known however, and therefore assigning costs to different landscape elements is often a challenge in creating cost surface maps. As such, we consider it important to understand the sensitivity of connectivity estimates to uncertainty in cost estimates.

methodsWe used simulated landscapes to test the sensitivity of current density estimates from circuit theory to varying relative cost values, fragmentation, and number of cost classes (i.e., thematic resolution). Current density is proportional to the probability of use during a random walk. Using Circuitscape software, we simulated electrical current between pairs of nodes to create current density maps. We then measured the correlation of the current density values across scenarios.

resultsIn general, we found that cost values were highly correlated across scenarios with different cost weights (mean correlation ranged from 0.87 to 0.92). Changing the spatial configuration of landscape elements by varying the degree of fragmentation reduced correlation in current density across maps. We also found that correlations were more variable when the range of cost values in a map was high. DISCUSSION: The low sensitivity of current density estimates to relative cost weights suggests that the measure may be reliable for land use applications even when there is uncertainty about absolute cost values, provided that the user has the costs correctly ranked. This finding should facilitate the use of cost surfaces by conservation practitioners interested in estimating connectivity and planning linkages and corridors.

Indexed as

CircuitscapeCircuit theoryCost surfaceCurrent densityDispersalLandscape connectivityLeast cost path

Identifiers

PMID32832267
PMCPMC7409782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.