ArticlePeerJ2020
Improved normalization of species count data in ecology by scaling with ranked subsampling (SRS): application to microbial communities.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
118 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbial dynamics and antibiotic resistance during rifaximin therapy in severe cirrhosis: a ProPILA-Rifax ancillary study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Effects of a three-year maize-soybean rotation on soil bacterial diversity and fumonisin-producing Fusarium spp. inoculum potential.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics links microbial dysbiosis, systemic inflammation, and metabolomic disruptions to SNAE risk in treated HIV.JCI insight · 2026Article
- From disturbance to resilience: early microbial community establishment in landslide soils of New Zealand.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Assessment of Stability of Preservation Techniques for Strawberry Soil Microbiomes: Exploring the Biotechnological Relevance for Sustainable Agriculture.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Electricity-Induced SimultaneousACS ES&T water · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiota as a Key Modulator in the Pathophysiology of Sepsis: SURVEIL Project.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Consistent, Scale-Dependent Differences in the Biogeography of Host-Associated and Free-Living Microbiomes Across Systems.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-omics links microbial dysbiosis, systemic inflammation and metabolomic disruptions to SNAE risk in treated HIV.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bacterial taxa associated with lung cancer cases in Southeast Asians: a pilot case-control study.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Metagenomic insights into the global wild boar faecal microbiome reveal novel taxa and carbohydrate degraders distinguishing wild and domesticated Sus.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Phosphorus Acquisition Strategies Among Phytoplankton and Free-Living Bacterial Communities in the Baltic Proper.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Unlocking the microbiome of an extremophile plant: metagenomic insights into Calotropis procera's endo-rhizosphere communities.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- African carnivore gut bacterial diversity and composition are associated with sample condition but not storage technique.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Metabarcoding Reveals Rich and Diverse Aeromycobiota in Protected Oak Forests.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Weathering the Storm: Legacies of Extreme Meteorological Events and Daily Weather Variability Shape the Skin Microbiota of the Endangered Golden Alpine SalamanderEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Variations in Urinary Microbiota on a Short-Duration Space Mission to the International Space Station.JU open plus · 2026Article
58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnalysis of species count data in ecology often requires normalization to an identical sample size. Rarefying (random subsampling without replacement), which is the current standard method for normalization, has been widely criticized for its poor reproducibility and potential distortion of the community structure. In the context of microbiome count data, researchers explicitly advised against the use of rarefying. Here we introduce a normalization method for species count data called scaling with ranked subsampling (SRS) and demonstrate its suitability for the analysis of microbial communities.
methodsSRS consists of two steps. In the scaling step, the counts for all species or operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are divided by a scaling factor chosen in such a way that the sum of scaled counts equals the selected total number of counts C
resultsSRS showed greater reproducibility and preserved OTU frequencies and alpha diversity better than rarefying. The variance in Shannon diversity increased with the reduction of the library size after rarefying but remained zero for SRS. Relative abundances of OTUs strongly varied among libraries generated by rarefying, whereas libraries normalized by SRS showed only negligible variation. Bray-Curtis index of dissimilarity among replicates of the same library normalized by rarefying revealed a large variation in species composition, which reached complete dissimilarity (not a single OTU shared) among some libraries rarefied to a small size. The dissimilarity among replicated libraries normalized by SRS remained negligibly low at each library size. The variance in dissimilarity increased with the decreasing library size after rarefying, whereas it remained either zero or negligibly low after SRS.
conclusionsNormalization of OTU or species counts by scaling with ranked subsampling preserves the original community structure by minimizing subsampling errors. We therefore propose SRS for the normalization of biological count data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.