ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020
Comparison of Rates of Progression of Macular OCT Measures in Glaucoma.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- A SPATIALLY VARYING HIERARCHICAL RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL FOR LONGITUDINAL MACULAR STRUCTURAL DATA IN GLAUCOMA PATIENTS.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- A Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial Longitudinal Model Improves Estimation of Local Macular Rates of Change in Glaucomatous Eyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- A Model of Progression to Help Identify Macular Damage Due to Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Multivariate Longitudinal Modeling of Macular Ganglion Cell Complex: Spatiotemporal Correlations and Patterns of Longitudinal Change.Ophthalmology science · 2022Article
- Central Macular Topographic and Volumetric Measures: New Biomarkers for Detection of Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Ganglion Cell Complex: The Optimal Measure for Detection of Structural Progression in the Macula.American journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Agreement of different OCT scan directions for individual retinal-layer thickness measurements in multiple sclerosis subjects with prior unilateral optic neuritis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effect of idiopathic epiretinal membrane on macular ganglion cell complex measurement in eyes with glaucoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Prediction of Visual Field Progression from OCT Structural Measures in Moderate to Advanced Glaucoma.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Estimating Ganglion Cell Complex Rates of Change With Bayesian Hierarchical Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Detection of Glaucoma Deterioration in the Macular Region with Optical Coherence Tomography: Challenges and Solutions.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021Review
- Comparison of Ganglion Cell Layer and Ganglion Cell/Inner Plexiform Layer Measures for Detection of Early Glaucoma.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
- A Joint Bayesian Longitudinal Model for Macular Structure-Function Correlations in Glaucoma.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of change of various macular thickness measures and evaluate the influence of baseline damage on macular rates of change. Methods: One hundred twelve eyes (112 patients) with ≥ 2 years of follow-up and ≥ 5 macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and 10-2 visual field (VF) tests were included. OCT measures of interests were full macular thickness (FMT), ganglion cell complex (GCC), ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and outer retinal layer (ORL) thickness in 3° × 3° superpixels. Rates of change were estimated with linear regression and normalized by dividing rates by the average normative superpixel thickness. We compared rates of change and proportion of significantly worsening superpixels (detection rate) and improving superpixels (false discovery rate [FDR]) among macular measures as a function of baseline thickness and 10-2 VF status. Results: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) baseline VF mean deviation, follow-up time, and number of VFs/OCTs were -7.6 dB (-11.8 to -3.8 dB), 4.5 years (4.0-5.0 years), and 9 (8-10), respectively. Normalized FMT and GCC rates of change were faster and detection rates were higher than GCIPL and GCL ( Conclusions: GCC measurements are most likely to detect structural worsening along the spectrum of glaucoma severity. Although FMT rates of change are least influenced by baseline thickness, they partially reflect likely age-related ORL changes. Translational Relevance: GCC thickness measurements seem to be the optimal macular outcome measure for detection of glaucoma deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.