Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832231›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Presbyopia Treatment With Eye Drops: An Eight Year Retrospective Study.

Giovanna Benozzi, Cristian Perez, Juliana Leiro, Sonia Facal, Betina Orman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A Comparative Clinical Study of 0.50% Versus 0.75% Pilocarpine Eye Drops for Improving Visual Performance in Presbyopia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  6. Presbyopia: Current Perspectives and Prospects for Patients.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Pharmacological treatment of presbyopia: A systematic review.European journal of translational myology · 2022
    Article
  17. Pharmacological Treatment in Presbyopia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. A multicentric study of pharmacological treatment for presbyopia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanna BenozziCentro de Investigación Avanzada para la Presbicia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cristian PerezCentro de Investigación Avanzada para la Presbicia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juliana LeiroCentro de Investigación Avanzada para la Presbicia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sonia FacalCentro de Investigación Avanzada para la Presbicia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Betina OrmanPharmacology Unit, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Universidad de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy across time, of patients topically treated with Benozzi's method for presbyopia. Methods: A nonrandomized case series retrospective study was developed, including patients with emmetropia with binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 25/20 or better, and with uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at least Jaeger 2 or worse. The study was set in Buenos Aires, Argentina, from January 2011 to June 2018, with at least 1-year follow-up. Patients were treated with pilocarpine and diclofenac preservative-free eye drops (Benozzi Method; US 8.524.758 B2, EP1.938.839 B1), and the main outcome measured was binocular UNVA at different follow-up times. Other parameters, as the UDVA and presence of side effects, were evaluated. Results: A total of 910 patients were included with a mean age at baseline of 48.67 ± 3.72 years old (range, 40-59 years). The baseline UNVA was 4.74 ± 1.53 and at 8 years of follow-up was decreased to 1.36 ± 0.48 (Jaeger scale). The mean binocular UDVA at baseline was 0.00 ± 0.01 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and after 8 years of follow-up was 0.03 ± 0.04 logMAR. All side effects reported (decrease of light perception, headaches, symptoms of ocular surface dryness, and dizziness) were spontaneously resolved in patients who continued with the treatment. Conclusions: The efficacy of the pharmacological treatment of presbyopia to improve the UNVA without affecting the UDVA is shown. Side effects were well tolerated and resolved before 1 year of treatment. Translational Relevance: This is a nonsurgical option for patients with emmetropic presbyopia who do not wish to wear glasses, which is a pharmacological treatment with eye drops.

Indexed as

PresbyopiaAdultArgentinaHumansMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesOphthalmic Solutionsaccommodationpharmacological treatmentpresbyopiaspectacle independence

Identifiers

PMID32832231
PMCPMC7414614
OpenAlexW3036266904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.