Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832206›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs.

Huazhu Fu, Fei Li, Yanwu Xu, Jingan Liao, Jian Xiong, Jianbing Shen, Jiang Liu, Xiulan Zhang, for iChallenge-GON study group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Assessing Inter-Annotator Agreement for Medical Image Segmentation.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2023
    Article
  4. A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm.Translational vision science & technology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Huazhu FuInception Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Fei LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yanwu XuIntelligent Healthcare Unit, Baidu, Beijing, China.
Jingan LiaoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jian XiongState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jianbing ShenInception Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Jiang LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiulan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
for iChallenge-GON study group
Sun Yat-sen University · CNInception Institute of Artificial Intelligence · AEBaidu (China) · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) segmentation are fundamental for fundus image analysis. Manual annotation is time consuming, expensive, and highly subjective, whereas an automated system is invaluable to the medical community. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning system to segment OD and OC in fundus photographs, and evaluate how the algorithm compares against manual annotations. Methods: A total of 1200 fundus photographs with 120 glaucoma cases were collected. The OD and OC annotations were labeled by seven licensed ophthalmologists, and glaucoma diagnoses were based on comprehensive evaluations of the subject medical records. A deep learning system for OD and OC segmentation was developed. The performances of segmentation and glaucoma discriminating based on the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) of automated model were compared against the manual annotations. Results: The algorithm achieved an OD dice of 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.934-0.941), OC dice of 0.801 (95% CI = 0.793-0.809), and CDR mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.077 (95% CI = 0.073 mean absolute error (MAE)0.082). For glaucoma discriminating based on CDR calculations, the algorithm obtained an area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI = 0.920 mean absolute error (MAE)0.973), with a sensitivity of 0.850 (95% CI = 0.794-0.923) and specificity of 0.853 (95% CI = 0.798-0.918). Conclusions: We demonstrated the potential of the deep learning system to assist ophthalmologists in analyzing OD and OC segmentation and discriminating glaucoma from nonglaucoma subjects based on CDR calculations. Translational Relevance: We investigate the segmentation of OD and OC by deep learning system compared against the manual annotations.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOptic DiskDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalFundus OculiHumansRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligenceoptic cupoptic discsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID32832206
PMCPMC7414704
OpenAlexW3037115995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.