ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020
EMKLAS: A New Automatic Scoring System for Early and Mild Keratoconus Detection.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of keratoconus: a systematic review.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosis of keratoconus using Scheimpflug based corneal tomography.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Advances in machine learning for keratoconus diagnosis.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Smart decision support system for keratoconus severity staging using corneal curvature and thinnest pachymetry indices.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Article
- Computer-aided diagnosis of keratoconus through VAE-augmented images using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Keratoconus Diagnosis: From Fundamentals to Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Accuracy of Machine Learning Assisted Detection of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Keratoconus Diagnostic and Treatment Algorithms Based on Machine-Learning Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Meibography Phenotyping and Classification From Unsupervised Discriminative Feature Learning.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Keratoconus Severity Classification Using Features Selection and Machine Learning Algorithms.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Create a unique predictive model based on a set of demographic, optical, and geometric variables with two objectives: classifying keratoconus (KC) in its first clinical manifestation stages and establishing the probability of having correctly classified each case. Methods: We selected 178 eyes of 178 subjects (115 males; 64.6%; 63 females, 35.4%). Of these, 74 were healthy control subjects, and 104 suffered from KC according to the RETICS grading system (61 early KC, 43 mild KC). Only one eye from each patient was selected, and 27 different parameters were studied (demographic, clinical, pachymetric, and geometric). The data obtained were used in an ordinal logistic regression model programmed as a web application capable of using new patient data for real-time predictions. Results: EMKLAS, an early and mild KC classifier, showed good training performance figures, with 73% global accuracy and a 95% confidence interval of 65% to 79%. This classifier is particularly accurate when validated by an independent sample for the control (79%) and mild KC (80%) groups. The accuracy of the early KC group was remarkably lower (69%). The variables included in the model were age, gender, corrected distance visual acuity, 8-mm corneal diameter, and posterior minimum thickness point deviation. Conclusions: Our web application allows fast, objective, and quantitative assessment of early and mild KC in detection and classification terms and assists ophthalmology professionals in diagnosing this disease. Translational Relevance: No single gold standard exists for detecting and classifying preclinical KC, but the use of our web application and EMKLAS score may aid the decision-making process of doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.