Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32832116›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2020

Patient acceptance of HIV testing services in rural emergency departments in South Africa.

Aditi Rao, Caitlin Kennedy, Pamela Mda, Thomas C Quinn, David Stead, Bhakti Hansoti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and predictors of medical information avoidance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aditi RaoDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-5778
Caitlin KennedyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-063X
Pamela MdaNelson Mandela Academic Clinical Research Unit, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8292-8221
Thomas C QuinnDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-0294
David SteadDepartment of Medicine, Frere and Cecilia Makiwane Hospitals, East London, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2908-7176
Bhakti HansotiDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0188-9764
Johns Hopkins University · USNelson Mandela Academic Hospital · ZAWalter Sisulu University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa faces the highest burden of HIV infection globally. The National Strategic Plan on HIV recommends provider-initiated HIV counselling and testing (HCT) in all healthcare facilities. However, HIV continues to overwhelm the healthcare system. Emergency department (ED)-based HCT could address unmet testing needs.

objectivesThis study examines the reasons for accepting or declining HCT in South African EDs to inform the development of HCT implementation strategies.

methodWe conducted a prospective observational study in two rural EDs, from June to September 2017. Patients presenting to the ED were systematically approached and offered a point-of-care test in accordance with national guidelines. Patients demographics, presenting compaint, medical history and reasons for accepting/declining testing, were recorded. A pooled analysis is presented.

resultsAcross sites, 2074 adult, non-critical patients in the ED were approached; 1880 were enrolled in the study. Of those enrolled, 19.7% had a previously known positive diagnosis, and 80.3% were unaware of their HIV status. Of those unaware, 90% patients accepted and 10% declined testing. The primary reasons for declining testing were 'does not want to know status' (37.6%), 'in too much pain' (34%) and 'does not believe they are at risk' (19.9%).

conclusionsDespite national guidelines, a high proportion of individuals remain undiagnosed, of which a majority are young men. Our study demonstrated high patient acceptance of ED-based HCT. There is a need for investment and innovation regarding effective pain management and confidential service delivery to address patient barriers. Findings support a routine, non-targeted HCT strategy in EDs.

Indexed as

emergency departmentHIV counselling and testingimplementation researchlinkage to carepatient acceptanceSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID32832116
PMCPMC7433237
OpenAlexW3045155485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.