ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
A mutation can hide another one: Think Structural Variants!
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The known structural variations in hearing loss and their diagnostic approaches: a comprehensive review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- The First Large Deletion ofBiomedicines · 2023Article
- From Negative to Positive Diagnosis: Structural Variation Could Be the Second Mutation You Are Looking for in a Recessive Autosomal Gene.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Genetics of Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) and Role of Sacsin in Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Genetic spectrum and clinical features in a cohort of Chinese patients with autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias.Translational neurodegeneration · 2021Article
- GDAP1 Involvement in Mitochondrial Function and Oxidative Stress, Investigated in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth Model of hiPSCs-Derived Motor Neurons.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- New structural variations responsible for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: The first two largeComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) using capture or amplicons strategies allows the detection of a large number of mutations increasing the rate of positive diagnosis for the patients. However, most of the detected mutations are Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) or small indels. Structural Variants (SVs) are often underdiagnosed in inherited genetic diseases, probably because few user-friendly tools are available for biologists or geneticists to identify them easily. We present here the diagnosis of two brothers presenting a demyelinating motor-sensitive neuropathy: a presumed homozygous c.5744_5745delAT in exon 10 of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.