ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2020
A realistic flow phantom model of the carotid artery in preterm infants for training and research.
Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of Carotid Artery Phantoms for Doppler Ultrasound Applications.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCerebral blood flow is increasingly monitored in preterm infants. Doppler ultrasound of the carotid artery is a widely available method but is operator dependent. Our aim was to design and produce a realistic flow phantom model of the carotid artery of preterm infants.
methodsData from cerebral blood flow measurements using Doppler ultrasound of the right common carotid artery from 21 premature newborn infants were used to produce a Doppler flow phantom model with three different vessel diameters. Vessel diameter, continuous and pulsatile flow volume measurements were performed by two blinded observers (with more than eight and 20 years of experience).
resultsVessel diameter measurements using the phantom were underestimated by 7%. Continuous flow volume measurements were overestimated by 7% by both observers (observer 1 mean difference 1.5 ± 1.96 SD -3.3 to 6.3 ml/min versus observer 2, 1.9 ± 1.96 SD -3.6 to 7.4 ml/min). Pulsatile flow measurements were overestimated by 12.6% by observer 1 (2.7 ± 1.96 SD -0.6 to 5.9 ml/min) and by 7.8% by observer 2 (1.7 ± 1.96 SD -1.6 to 4.9 ml/min). There was good interobserver and intraobserver reliability for the majority of measurements using continuous and pulsatile flow.
conclusionIt is feasible to produce a realistic flow phantom model of the neonatal carotid artery of preterm infants. Diameter measurements were underestimated and flow measurements were overestimated. These errors fell within acceptable limits for in vivo measurements. If these limitations were related to materials, this could be explored using a wall-less model. The flow phantom could be utilised for research and training clinicians in measuring cerebral blood flow using the carotid artery in this vulnerable group of infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.