Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831851›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2020

Does Luteal Phase Support Effect Pregnancy Rates in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles? A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study in a Tertiary Center.

Müge Keskin, Ruşen Aytaç

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05276531 (Comparison of the Effect of Subcutaneous Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in Intrauterine Insemination), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05276531 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effect of Subcutaneous Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in Intrauterine Insemination

TypeinterventionalSponsorBezmialem Vakif UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled146ConditionsProgesteroneArmssubcutaneous progesterone, vaginal progesterone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Müge KeskinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ufuk University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7510-7898
Ruşen AytaçDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TRUfuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a common treatment for couples with subfertility. Clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, and letrozole are used for ovulation induction in IUI cycles. It has been well documented that luteal support with exogenous progesterone after in vitro fertilization is associated with higher pregnancy and live birth rates. Yet, luteal phase support in IUI cycles has become a debatable issue. The aim of this prospective controlled study was to assess the effect of luteal phase vaginal progesterone supplementation on

Identifiers

PMID32831851
PMCPMC7426789
OpenAlexW3047488899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.