Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831616›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2020

Locally adaptive activation functions with slope recovery for deep and physics-informed neural networks.

Ameya D Jagtap, Kenji Kawaguchi, George Em Karniadakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. From PINNs to PIKANs: recent advances in physics-informed machine learning.Machine learning for computational science and engineering · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Coagulo-Net: Enhancing the mathematical modeling of blood coagulation using physics-informed neural networks.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ameya D JagtapDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 182 George Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8831-1000
Kenji KawaguchiMassachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
George Em KarniadakisDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 182 George Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose two approaches of locally adaptive activation functions namely, layer-wise and neuron-wise locally adaptive activation functions, which improve the performance of deep and physics-informed neural networks. The local adaptation of activation function is achieved by introducing a scalable parameter in each layer (layer-wise) and for every neuron (neuron-wise) separately, and then optimizing it using a variant of stochastic gradient descent algorithm. In order to further increase the training speed, an activation slope-based

Indexed as

accelerated trainingbad minimadeep learning benchmarksmachine learningphysics-informed neural networksstochastic gradients

Identifiers

PMID32831616
PMCPMC7426042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.