Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831581›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2020

Biomechanical modelling of spinal tumour anisotropic growth.

Ioanna Katsamba, Pavlos Evangelidis, Chrysovalantis Voutouri, Alkiviadis Tsamis, Vasileios Vavourakis, Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 75 Years of Mathematical Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mechanical models and measurement methods of solid stress in tumors.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioanna KatsambaCancer Biophysics Laboratory, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-7296-152X
Pavlos EvangelidisCancer Biophysics Laboratory, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
Chrysovalantis VoutouriCancer Biophysics Laboratory, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
Alkiviadis TsamisSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Vasileios VavourakisDepartment of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-4102-2084
Triantafyllos StylianopoulosCancer Biophysics Laboratory, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-3093-1696
University of Cyprus · CYUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomechanical abnormalities of solid tumours involve stiffening of the tissue and accumulation of mechanical stresses. Both abnormalities affect cancer cell proliferation and invasiveness and thus, play a crucial role in tumour morphology and metastasis. Even though, it has been known for more than two decades that high mechanical stresses reduce cancer cell proliferation rates driving growth towards low-stress regions, most biomechanical models of tumour growth account for isotropic growth. This cannot be valid, however, in tumours that grow within multiple host tissues of different mechanical properties, such as the spine. In these cases, structural heterogeneity would result in anisotropic growth of tumours. To this end, we present a biomechanical, biphasic model for anisotropic growth of spinal tumours. The model that accounts for both the fluid and the solid phase of the tumour was used to predict the evolution of solid stress and interstitial fluid pressure in intramedullary spinal tumours and highlight the differences between isotropic and anisotropic growth. Varying the degree of anisotropy, we found considerable differences in the shape of the tumours, leading to tumours of more realistic ellipsoidal shapes.

Indexed as

biphasic theoryimage reconstructioninterstitial fluid pressuremathematical modellingsolid stress

Identifiers

PMID32831581
PMCPMC7428026
OpenAlexW3033495192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.