ArticleInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology2020
Genotypic Variation in
Article in Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Diagnosis ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2026Review
- The prevalence trends of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among women in Jingzhou, central of China, 2019-2023.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection ofAfrican journal of laboratory medicine · 2025Review
- Characterization of Actin-based Genotypes and Mycoplasma Endosymbionts of Trichomonas vaginalis Isolated in Sapporo, Japan.Acta parasitologica · 2024Article
- Forensic parasitology: a new frontier in criminalistics.Forensic sciences research · 2024Review
- Microscopic and molecular detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Involvement of Macrophages in Proliferation of Prostate Cancer Cells Infected with Trichomonas vaginalis.The Korean journal of parasitology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: In this study, 362 pregnant women from the King Edward VIII Hospital in Durban, South Africa, provided vaginal swabs to be tested for the presence of Results: The prevalence of Conclusion: Three different genotypes were observed in the pregnant population. Diversity was observed across and within genotypes. The observed diversity can be challenging for future vaccine design and development of antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests for trichomoniasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.