Trial reportJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Laparoscopic Posterior Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Gynecology.
Trial report in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopically guided transversus abdominis plane block versus local wound infiltration analgesia in laparoscopic surgery for peritoneal endometriosis: A prospective randomized controlled double-blinded LTAP-trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Trial
- Response to Letter to the Editor: Laparoscopic Posterior Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Gynecology.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesTransversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a safe and effective type of regional anesthesia technique used in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery to minimize postoperative pain. Our study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of the posterior versus lateral approaches to laparoscopic-assisted TAP block in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
methodsWe performed a randomized controlled trial with 82 patients allocated to either posterior (n = 38) or lateral (n = 44) TAP block groups. Laparoscopic-assisted posterior or lateral TAP block was administered using liposomal bupivacaine mixture. All subjects were asked to fill out a questionnaire, which included postoperative pain scores at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, as well as narcotic utilization postoperatively. Both groups were compared for postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, perioperative, and demographic characteristics.
resultsA total of 67 patients were analyzed in our study (n = 33 in posterior arm, n = 34 in lateral arm). Demographic characteristics including race, body mass index, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, pre-operative diagnosis, complication rates, length of stay, and estimated blood loss were comparable between the two groups. The distribution of different operative procedures was similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h postoperatively between the two groups. However, patients receiving posterior TAP had a significant reduction in narcotic intake (
conclusionLaparoscopic-assisted TAP block is a safe and effective option for regional analgesia in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Posterior TAP block may help to reduce narcotic usage postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.