Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831478›Full record

ArticleReading and writing2020

Executive functions and components of oral reading fluency through the lens of text complexity.

Tin Q Nguyen, Sage E Pickren, Neena M Saha, Laurie E Cutting

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reading and writing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tin Q NguyenVanderbilt University, 1400 18th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Sage E PickrenVanderbilt University, 1400 18th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Neena M SahaVanderbilt University, 1400 18th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Laurie E CuttingVanderbilt University, 1400 18th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

VALIDITY OF SUBTYPES OF ADHDP50HD027802 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI Marie T Banich · 1990 to 2026
$44.9M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Cognitive and Neural Processes in Reading ComprehensionR01HD044073 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2004 to 2019
$8.1M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Predicting Late-Emerging RD: Neurobiological and Cognitive FactorsR01HD067254 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Word Problems, Language, & Comorbid Learning DisabilitiesP20HD075443 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FUCHS, LYNN S · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
The neurocognition of procedural and declarative memory in dyslexia and S-RCDR21HD087088 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CUTTING, LAURIE E · 2016 to 2017
$434k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NICHD NIH HHS P20 HD075443NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD027802NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044073NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067254NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087088NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As readers struggle to coordinate various reading- and language-related skills during oral reading fluency (ORF), miscues can emerge, especially when processing complex texts. Following a miscue, students often self-correct as a strategy to potentially restore ORF and online linguistic comprehension. Executive functions (EF) are hypothesized to play an interactive role during ORF. Yet, the role of EF in self-corrections while reading complex texts remains elusive. To this end, we evaluated the relation between students' probability of self-correcting miscues-or P(SC)-and their EF profile in a cohort of 143 participants (aged 9-15) who represented a diverse spectrum of reading abilities. Moreover, we used experimentally-manipulated passages (decoding, vocabulary, syntax, and cohesion) and employed a fully cross-classified mixed-effects multilevel regression strategy to evaluate the interplay between components of ORF, EF, and text complexity. Our results revealed that, after controlling for reading and language abilities, increased production of miscues across different passage conditions was explained by worse EF. We also found that students with better EF exhibited greater P(SC) when reading complex texts. While text complexity taxes students' EF and influences their production of miscues, findings suggest that EF may be interactively recruited to restore ORF via self-correcting oral reading errors. Overall, our results suggest that domain-general processes (e.g., EF) are associated with production of miscues and may underlie students' behavior of self-corrections, especially when reading complex texts. Further understanding of the relation between different components of ORF and cognitive processes may inform intervention strategies to improve reading proficiency and overall academic performance.

Indexed as

Executive functionsMiscuesMultilevel modelsOral reading fluencySelf-correctionsText complexity

Identifiers

PMID32831478
PMCPMC7437995
OpenAlexW3006075613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.