ArticleCognitive development
Characterizing Children's Intuitive Theories of Disease: The Case of Flu.
Article in Cognitive development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It kinda has like a mind": Children's and parents' beliefs concerning viral disease transmission for COVID-19 and the common cold.Cognition · 2023Article
- Teaching and learning about respiratory infectious diseases: A scoping review of interventions in K-12 education.Journal of research in science teaching · 2022Article
- Differences in Psychological and Behavioral Changes between Children following School Closure due to COVID-19.Psychiatry journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To advance the study of children's knowledge and understanding of disease, we devised a methodology for assessing key features of intuitive theories laid out by Wellman and Gelman (1998). We then assessed a disease-relevant biological ontology, causal propositions involving unobservables, and coherence in explanations of influenza offered by children aged 8 to 13. Use of disease-relevant terms and mention of propositions in a biological theory of flu causality, although not coherence or connectedness of ideas, increased with age. Measures were moderately correlated with one another and with a traditional Piagetian measure of level of disease understanding, each contributing uniquely to the characterization of children's thinking. In multiple regression analyses, scores were highest for older children, Latino/minority children, and children of more educated parents with other factors controlled. Specific gaps in children's intuitive theories are identified to guide theory-based interventions aimed at helping children understand and protect themselves from infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.