ArticleAquacultural engineering2020
3-D Printed Customizable Vitrification Devices for Preservation of Genetic Resources of Aquatic Species.
Article in Aquacultural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring pathways toward open-hardware ecosystems to safeguard genetic resources for biomedical research communities using aquatic model species.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024Review
- Use of Cryopreserved Sperm of Grass Carp (Aquaculture research · 2024Article
- Initial assessment of the toxicologic effects of leachates from 3-dimensional (3-D) printed objects on sperm quality in two model fish species.Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- An automated modular open-technology device to measure and adjust concentration of aquatic sperm samples for cryopreservation.SLAS technology · 2023Article
- Design, alpha testing, and beta testing of a 3-D printed open-hardware portable cryopreservation device for aquatic species.Journal of applied aquaculture · 2023Article
- The emerging role of open technologies for community-based improvement of cryopreservation and quality management for repository development in aquatic species.Animal reproduction science · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Cryopreservation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- An Open-Hardware Insemination Device for Small-Bodied Live-Bearing Fishes to Support Development and Use of Germplasm Repositories.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Article
- Is catalase an effective additive to alleviate oxidative stress during cryopreservation of zebrafish sperm at the repository level?Cryobiology · 2022Article
- An open hardware 3-D printed device for measuring tensile properties of thermoplastic filament polymers at cryogenic temperatures.Cryogenics · 2022Article
- Development of an open hardware 3-D printed conveyor device for continuous cryopreservation of non-batched samples.Aquacultural engineering · 2021Article
- A 3D Printed Vitrification Device for Storage in Cryopreservation Vials.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sperm vitrification as an alternative approach to conventional cryopreservation (equilibrium freezing) allows quick and low-cost sample preservation and is suitable for small-bodied aquatic species with miniscule testis, fieldwork at remote locations, and small-scale freezing for research purposes. The goal of this present study was to develop operational prototypes of 3-dimensional (3-D) printed vitrification devices with innovative components that can provide comprehensive functionalities for practical repository development for aquatic species. The design featured an elongated loop to suspend a thin film of sperm sample in cryoprotectant, a retractable sleeve to protect the vitrified samples and allow permanent labeling, a handle to facilitate processing and storage, and a shaft with annular grooves to guide positioning of the protective retractable sleeve. To span a wide range of sample capacities and configurations, a total of 39 different configurations (3 loop lengths ×13 loop heights) were fabricated by 3-D printing with the thermoplastics polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). A total of 86 devices were fabricated with ABS filament with a print failure rate of 9%, and 97 devices were fabricated with PLA filament with a failure rate of 20%. Major types of printing failures included disconnected loops, insufficient build surface adhesion, stringing, and inconsistent extrusion. The sample volume capacity ranged from 1-47 μL and had linear relationships to the loop lengths and layer numbers. Vitrified samples were observed in 10-mm and 15-mm loops fabricated with PLA and ABS but not in 20-mm loops. This study demonstrated the feasibility of development of standardized low-cost ($0.05 material cost) devices fabricated by 3-D printing with practical functions including vitrification, volume control, labeling, protection, and storage within conventional systems. These prototypes can be further developed, standardized, and used to assist development of germplasm repositories to protect the genetic resources of aquatic species by user groups such as breeders, hatcheries, aquariums, and researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.