Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831406›Full record

ArticlePolymer2019

Mass Spectrometry of Polyurethanes.

Tiffany M Crescentini, Jody C May, John A McLean, David M Hercules

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiffany M CrescentiniDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Jody C MayDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
John A McLeanDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
David M HerculesDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.

Funding

New Methodologies for Accelerating Natural Product DiscoveryR01GM092218 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BACHMANN, BRIAN O, MCLEAN, JOHN ALAN · 2010 to 2018
$2.8M
Ion mobility based informatics and visualization strategies in support of metabolomicsR03CA222452 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MCLEAN, JOHN ALAN · 2017 to 2017
$152k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA222452NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review covers the applications of mass spectrometry (MS) and its hyphenated techniques to characterize polyurethane (PU) synthetic polymers and their respective hard and soft segments. PUs are commonly composed of hard segments including methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI), and soft segments including polyester and polyether polyols. This literature review highlights MS techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI), matrix assisted laser/desorption ionization (MALDI), ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS), and computational methods that have been used for the characterization of this polymer system. Here we review specific case studies where MS techniques have elucidated unique features pertaining to the makeup and structural integrity of complex PU materials and PU precursors.

Indexed as

electrospray ionizationion mobilityMALDIpolyesterspolyetherspolyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID32831406
PMCPMC7442140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.