Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831179›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Designing an Information and Communications Technology Tool With and for Victims of Violence and Their Case Managers in San Francisco: Human-Centered Design Study.

Devika Patel, Siavash Sarlati, Patrick Martin-Tuite, Joshua Feler, Lara Chehab, Michael Texada, Ruben Marquez, F Julia Orellana, Terrell L Henderson, Adaobi Nwabuo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Devika PatelDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1479-3588
Siavash SarlatiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-9130
Patrick Martin-TuiteUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7772-9172
Joshua FelerYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9206-6394
Lara ChehabDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6166-8432
Michael TexadaDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-5861
Ruben MarquezDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8331-9911
F Julia OrellanaDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7688-4533
Terrell L HendersonDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5368-3931
Adaobi NwabuoDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9263-5470
Rebecca PlevinDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3321-8076
Rochelle Ami DickerDivision of Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3572-8221
Catherine JuillardDivision of Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0847-8933
Amanda SammannDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8044-7165
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViolence is a public health problem. Hospital-based violence intervention programs such as the San Francisco Wraparound Project (WAP) have been shown to reduce future violent injury. The WAP model employs culturally competent case managers who recruit and enroll violently injured patients as clients. Client acceptance of the WAP intervention is variable, and program success depends on streamlined, timely communication and access to resources. High rates of smartphone usage in populations who are at risk for violent reinjury create an opportunity to design a tailored information and communications technology (ICT) tool to support hospital-based violence intervention programs.

objectiveCurrent evidence shows that ICT tools developed in the health care space may not be successful in engaging vulnerable populations. The goal of this study was to use human-centered design methodology to identify the unique communication needs of the clients and case managers at WAP to design a mobile ICT.

methodsWe conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with users: clients, their friends and families, case managers, and other stakeholders in violence intervention and prevention. We used a human-centered design and general inductive approach to thematic analysis to identify themes in the qualitative data, which were extrapolated to insight statements and then reframed into design opportunities. Wireframes of potential mobile ICT app screens were developed to depict these opportunities.

resultsThematic analysis revealed four main insights that were characterized by the opposing needs of our users. (1) A successful relationship is both professional and personal. Clients need this around the clock, but case managers can only support this while on the clock. (2) Communications need to feel personal, but they do not always need to be personalized. (3) Healing is a journey of skill development and lifestyle changes that must be acknowledged, monitored, and rewarded. (4) Social networks need to provide peer support for healing rather than peer pressure to propagate violence. These insights resulted in the following associated design opportunities: (1) Maximize personal connection while controlling access, (2) allow case managers to personalize automated client interactions, (3) hold clients accountable to progress and reward achievements, and (4) build a connected, yet confidential community.

conclusionsHuman-centered design enabled us to identify unique insights and design opportunities that may inform the design of a novel and tailored mobile ICT tool for the WAP community.

Indexed as

Case ManagersCommunicationHumansSan FranciscoTechnologyViolencehuman-centered designinformation and communications technologyviolence intervention

Identifiers

PMID32831179
PMCPMC7477672
OpenAlexW3081304469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.