ArticleeLife2020
Shared and modality-specific brain regions that mediate auditory and visual word comprehension.
Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic review of the impact of stimulus presentation modality on fMRI studies for presurgical mapping.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Review
- A cortical gradient in area 55b links language and somato-cognitive action networks.Research square · 2026Article
- Reading ability in both deaf and hearing adults is linked to neural representations of abstract phonology derived from visual speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Long-term musical training can protect against age-related upregulation of neural activity in speech-in-noise perception.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
- Cortical tracking of formant modulations derived from silently presented lip movements and its decline with age.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
- Article
- Shared and modality-specific brain regions that mediate auditory and visual word comprehension.eLife · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual speech carried by lip movements is an integral part of communication. Yet, it remains unclear in how far visual and acoustic speech comprehension are mediated by the same brain regions. Using multivariate classification of full-brain MEG data, we first probed where the brain represents acoustically and visually conveyed word identities. We then tested where these sensory-driven representations are predictive of participants' trial-wise comprehension. The comprehension-relevant representations of auditory and visual speech converged only in anterior angular and inferior frontal regions and were spatially dissociated from those representations that best reflected the sensory-driven word identity. These results provide a neural explanation for the behavioural dissociation of acoustic and visual speech comprehension and suggest that cerebral representations encoding word identities may be more modality-specific than often upheld.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.