Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831119›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020

Conservative treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review.

Manuel Soler-Peiro, Lorena García-Martínez, Luis Aguilella, Marcelino Perez-Bermejo

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. The fragility and reverse fragility indices of proximal humerus fracture randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sentinel fracture: the necessity of improved post-fracture care.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PlateWorld journal of orthopedics · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel Soler-PeiroUpper Extremity Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Valencia, Spain. manuel.soler.peiro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7769-0543
Lorena García-MartínezUpper Extremity Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Valencia, Spain.
Luis AguilellaUpper Extremity Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Valencia, Spain.
Marcelino Perez-BermejoSchool of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Hospital de La Ribera · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there are numerous publications about surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs), few assess conservative treatment, which is the most common approach. The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess criteria for indications, treatment protocols, and outcomes obtained with the conservative treatment of 3-part and 4-part PHF.

methodsWe searched the PubMed and Cochrane databases for clinical studies published between 2000 and 2019 on conservative treatment for 3-part and 4-part PHF that included patients older than 18 years, a minimum follow-up of 1 year, fracture classification, and description of outcomes with assessment scales.

resultsThe search yielded 26,660 records. We reviewed 44 of them in full, and finally 6 studies were included. We obtained a population of 133 patients (79% women), with a mean age of 74.3 years (range 25 to 98) and mean follow-up of 32 months (range 12 to 68.8). According to the Neer classification system, there were 41% (55) three-part fractures and 59% (78) four-part fractures; 5.81% of the patients were lost to follow-up. The mean Constant score was 64.5 for three-part fractures and 54.9 patients with four-part fractures. Consolidation was achieved in 95% of the three-part fractures and 91% of the four-part fractures. Loss of mobility varied according to the type of fracture. Regarding complications, the most frequent was malunion (21%), followed by avascular necrosis (9%).

conclusionsOur data show that most three-part PHFs treated conservatively achieve fracture consolidation even noting a negligible rate of malunion got fair-good functional results with few complications, while the orthopedic four-part PHF treatment presents high rate of consolidation with less rate of malunion than the three-part PHF but achieve poor functional results with few complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Systematic Review.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overConservative TreatmentExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresRecovery of FunctionShoulder FracturesTreatment OutcomeAvascular necrosisComplicationsConservative treatmentConstant scoreFracture consolidationMalunionNeer classificationNonunionOutcomesProximal humeral fractureReview

Identifiers

PMID32831119
PMCPMC7444241
OpenAlexW3080221137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.