Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831103›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2020

Validation of the Activity Preference Assessment: a tool for quantifying children's implicit preferences for sedentary and physical activities.

S Nicole Fearnbach, Corby K Martin, Steven B Heymsfield, Amanda E Staiano, Robert L Newton, Alex C Garn, Neil M Johannsen, Daniel S Hsia, Owen T Carmichael, Sreekrishna Ramakrishnapillai and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03624582 (Validity and Reliability of the Activity Preference Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03624582 completednot on this map

Validity and Reliability of the Activity Preference Assessment: A Shape Up Kids Ancillary

TypeobservationalSponsorPennington Biomedical Research CenterRan2018 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsChildhood Obesity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Children's moderate-to-vigorous physical activity on weekdays versus weekend days: a multi-country analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S Nicole FearnbachClinical Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. Nicole.Fearnbach@pbrc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9208-830X
Corby K MartinClinical Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Steven B HeymsfieldClinical Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Amanda E StaianoPopulation and Public Health Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Robert L NewtonPopulation and Public Health Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Alex C GarnLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Neil M JohannsenClinical Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Daniel S HsiaClinical Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Owen T CarmichaelClinical Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Sreekrishna RamakrishnapillaiClinical Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Kori B MurrayClinical Sciences Division, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
John E BlundellUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
Graham FinlaysonUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
Pennington Biomedical Research Center · USUniversity of Leeds · GBLouisiana State University · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI ROBERT A KESTERSON · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
Shape up! KidsR01DK111698 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HEYMSFIELD, STEVEN, SHEPHERD, JOHN ALAN · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK111698NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh levels of sedentary behavior and low physical activity are associated with poor health, and the cognitive determinants of these behaviors in children and adolescents are not well understood. To address this gap, we developed a novel, non-verbal, computer-based assessment to quantify the degree to which youth prefer to be sedentary relative to physically active in their leisure time.

methodsThe Activity Preference Assessment (APA) uses a forced-choice paradigm to understand implicit decision-making processes when presented with common sedentary and physical activities. The APA bias score ranges from - 100 to + 100, with positive scores indicating a relative preference for sedentary activities, and negative scores representing a preference for physical activities. In 60 children ages 8-17 years, we assessed the validity of this behavioral task against a free-choice play observation, accelerometry-measured activity, anthropometrics and body composition, and cardiorespiratory fitness. We explored neighborhood, family, and individual-level factors that may influence implicit activity preferences. Test-retest reliability was assessed over one week.

resultsThe majority of children (67%) preferred sedentary relative to physical activities. APA bias scores were positively associated with sedentary time during free-choice play. In girls, bias scores were negatively associated with average daily MVPA. APA bias scores were positively associated with body fat and negatively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness. These findings were independent of age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Neighborhood access to physical activity spaces, the number of people in the home, perceived physical self-competence (e.g., coordination, strength), and self-reported depressive symptoms were associated with activity preferences. The intra-class correlation for test-retest reliability was r = 0.59.

conclusionsThe APA shows promise as a novel tool for quantifying children's relative preference for sedentary versus physical activities. Implicit bias scores from the APA are clinically meaningful, as shown by significant associations with adiposity and cardiorespiratory fitness. Future longitudinal studies should examine the directionality of the association between preferences and health markers, and the degree to which implicit activity preferences are modifiable. Importantly, the task only takes an average of 10 min to complete, highlighting a potential role as an efficient screening tool for the propensity to be sedentary versus physically active.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03624582 .

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorChild BehaviorDecision MakingExerciseLeisure ActivitiesSedentary BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesAccelerometryAdiposityAdolescentBody CompositionCardiorespiratory FitnessChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansDecision-makingFitnessObesityPediatricsSedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID32831103
PMCPMC7444062
OpenAlexW3080579011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.