Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32831064›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2020

The experience of loneliness among young people with depression: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature.

Louis Achterbergh, Alexandra Pitman, Mary Birken, Eiluned Pearce, Herman Sno, Sonia Johnson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Experiences of Loneliness Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Can Social Prescribing Foster Individual and Community Well-Being? A Systematic Review of the Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louis AchterberghUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. l.achterbergh@nwz.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-0073
Alexandra PitmanUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Mary BirkenUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Eiluned PearceUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Herman SnoAmsterdam UMC, location AMC (University of Amsterdam), Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, Netherlands.
Sonia JohnsonUCL Division of Psychiatry, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802441Medical Research Council MR/L501487/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung people have a higher prevalence of loneliness than other age groups, and they are also at risk of depression. Quantitative studies describe a bidirectional association between loneliness and depression, but there is limited understanding of how these influence each other. Little is known about the experience of loneliness among young people with depression. Qualitative approaches may help understand the relationship between loneliness and depression among young people, and how to intervene to improve outcomes. We aimed to conduct a meta-synthesis to understand the complex inter-relationship between loneliness and depression among young depressed people by synthesising evidence from a systematic review of qualitative studies.

methodsWe conducted a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies capturing experiences of loneliness among young people with depression. We systematically searched six electronic databases for selected search terms, critically appraised eligible studies, and analysed the data from included studies using the approach of thematic synthesis. We used feedback from an inter-disciplinary research workshop to improve reflexivity.

resultsOur inclusion criteria identified fourteen studies. Our analysis identified four themes: (1) social withdrawal due to poor mental health, (2) non-disclosure of depression contributing to social distance, (3) the desire to connect, and (4) paradoxes of loneliness and depression. These themes illustrated a range of pathways between depression and loneliness, and a sense of how these might be mutually reinforcing. Our findings suggest that where depressed individuals engage in certain behaviours (withdrawing; not confiding) for a range of reasons, this can lead to feelings of loneliness, an awareness of which worsens their mood, thus perpetuating their depression.

conclusionsYoung people with depression experience loneliness as an insurmountable distance between themselves and others. Our findings identified non-disclosure of depression, and the debilitating nature of the depressive symptomatology, as factors perpetuating a vicious cycle of loneliness and depression. They suggest that approaches to tackling the problem might include helping young people communicate about their depression to trusted friends and educating their social networks in how to support them. The wider research literature suggests that cognitive interventions may have a role in shifting maladaptive cognitions about their social world.

Indexed as

LonelinessMental DisordersAdolescentDepressionHumansQualitative ResearchDepressionLonelinessMeta-synthesisQualitative researchSocial isolationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32831064
PMCPMC7444250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.