Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32830873›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2020

Successive and automated stable isotope analysis of CO

Simon Leitner, Rebecca Hood-Nowotny, Andrea Watzinger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stable isotope analysis of atmospheric CORapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2023
    Article
  3. Successive and automated stable isotope analysis of CORapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon LeitnerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Institute of Soil Research, Konrad-Lorenz-Straße 24, Tulln, 3430, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-1720
Rebecca Hood-NowotnyUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Institute of Soil Research, Konrad-Lorenz-Straße 24, Tulln, 3430, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4398-3233
Andrea WatzingerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Institute of Soil Research, Konrad-Lorenz-Straße 24, Tulln, 3430, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9082-1544
BOKU University · AT

Funding

Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMeasurement of greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations and isotopic compositions in the atmosphere is a valuable tool for predicting their sources and sinks, and ultimately how they affect Earth's climate. Easy access to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has opened up new opportunities for remote gas sampling and provides logistical and economic opportunities to improve GHG measurements.

methodsThis study presents synchronized gas chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/IRMS) methods for the analysis of atmospheric gas samples (20-mL  glass vessels) to determine the stable isotope ratios and concentrations of CO

resultsThe precision of working gas standards achieved for δ

conclusionsResults from internal calibration and field sample analysis, as well as comparisons with similar measurement techniques, suggest that the method is applicable for the stable isotope analysis of these three important GHGs. In contrast to previously reported findings, the presented method enables successive analysis of all three GHGs from a single ambient atmospheric gas sample.

Identifiers

PMID32830873
PMCPMC7540016
OpenAlexW3080483391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.