Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32830337›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2021

Improved Transferability of Data-Driven Damage Models Through Sample Selection Bias Correction.

Dennis Wagenaar, Tiaravanni Hermawan, Marc J C van den Homberg, Jeroen C J H Aerts, Heidi Kreibich, Hans de Moel, Laurens M Bouwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dennis WagenaarDeltares, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5215-6435
Tiaravanni HermawanDeltares, Delft, The Netherlands.
Marc J C van den Homberg510 An initiative of the Netherlands Red Cross, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-254X
Jeroen C J H AertsDeltares, Delft, The Netherlands.
Heidi KreibichGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany.
Hans de MoelInstitute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurens M BouwerClimate Service Center Germany, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage models for natural hazards are used for decision making on reducing and transferring risk. The damage estimates from these models depend on many variables and their complex sometimes nonlinear relationships with the damage. In recent years, data-driven modeling techniques have been used to capture those relationships. The available data to build such models are often limited. Therefore, in practice it is usually necessary to transfer models to a different context. In this article, we show that this implies the samples used to build the model are often not fully representative for the situation where they need to be applied on, which leads to a "sample selection bias." In this article, we enhance data-driven damage models by applying methods, not previously applied to damage modeling, to correct for this bias before the machine learning (ML) models are trained. We demonstrate this with case studies on flooding in Europe, and typhoon wind damage in the Philippines. Two sample selection bias correction methods from the ML literature are applied and one of these methods is also adjusted to our problem. These three methods are combined with stochastic generation of synthetic damage data. We demonstrate that for both case studies, the sample selection bias correction techniques reduce model errors, especially for the mean bias error this reduction can be larger than 30%. The novel combination with stochastic data generation seems to enhance these techniques. This shows that sample selection bias correction methods are beneficial for damage model transfer.

Indexed as

damage modelingdisaster risk managementdomain adaptationflood risk managementloss modelingmachine learningsample selection bias correction

Identifiers

PMID32830337
PMCPMC7891600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.