Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32830323›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Developing patient-centric medicines for older people: Reflections from the draft EMA paper on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population.

Diana A van Riet-Nales, Katarina Sundberg, Anthonius de Boer, Blanka Hirschlérova

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Modeling Study for Hip Fracture Rates in Romania.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Public Engagement in Health Policy-Making for Older Adults: A Systematic Search and Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Diana A van Riet-NalesMedicines Evaluation Board, DVRN: International Collaboration Center, ADB: Chair of MEB, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4902-4519
Katarina SundbergDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Biotechnology, Swedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6641-7058
Anthonius de BoerMedicines Evaluation Board, DVRN: International Collaboration Center, ADB: Chair of MEB, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9485-8037
Blanka HirschlérovaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Assessment of Chemical and Herbal Products, State Institute for Drug Control, Prague, Czech Republic.
Medicines Evaluation Board · NLMedical Products Agency · SEState Institute for Drug Control · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased global longevity requires a re-evaluation of current structures in society to adapt to the consequential demographic shift. As (very) old people are prone to impaired human organ and body functions resulting in, for example, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, hospitalisation and problems in medication management, it is increasingly acknowledged that re-evaluations should include the suitability of pharmaceutical patient care as one of the cornerstones of public health. Following the 2011 European Medicines Agency (EMA) Geriatric Strategy, in 2017 the EMA published the draft "Reflection paper on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population". The draft paper was opened for public consultation and specific attention and feedback (either supportive or with a proposal for revision) was asked on three design aspects: tablet breaking, drug administration through enteral feeding tubes and medication management. Following publication, the draft paper was presented at two public conferences attended by participants from different disciplines. This manuscript is intended to draw the attention of different stakeholder parties to the urgent need to collaborate on the emerging issues arising from increasing longevity and multimorbidity, and especially those associated with pharmaceutical patient care and drug product design, including the need for collaborative research into existing or emerging knowledge gaps. The manuscript focuses on the three aforementioned aspects of pharmaceutical development (tablet breaking, drug administration through enteral feeding tubes and medication management) as these highly relate to medication safety and efficacy and constitute persistent and typical challenges for older people, caregivers and healthcare professionals in daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyResearch ReportAgedDrug DesignHumansPatient-Centered CareTabletsTabletsaged 80 and over [MeSH]clinical pharmacology, drug regulationclinical pharmacology, health policyclinical pharmacology, medication safetydrug development, drug deliveryEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA)medication errors [MeSH]public healthregulationstechnology pharmaceutical [MeSH]

Identifiers

PMID32830323
PMCPMC7495292
OpenAlexW3080780221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.