ReviewBMJ global health2020
Community engagement in outbreak response: lessons from the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone.
Review in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Field Investigation of the Bundibugyo Ebola Virus Disease (BDBV) Outbreak in Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo: Challenges, Strategies, and Priority Actions for Outbreak Control-An Outbreak Investigation Review.Infectious disease reports · 2026Article
- Qualitative Assessment of One Health Operationalization at the Central Level and in Two Border Districts of Sierra Leone.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Determinants of trust among ethnic minority community members towards community-based organisations and leaders during pandemics and other emergencies in Australia.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Mapping power in community engagement: methodological reflections from health emergencies.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Zoonotic disease knowledge, attitudes, and livestock biosecurity practices among community members in Ada East District, Ghana: a concurrent mixed-methods study.One health outlook · 2026Article
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Article
- An account of health systems resilience to emergencies in Africa: a scoping review.Globalization and health · 2026Article
- Financial barriers to healthcare access among reproductive-age women in Sierra Leone: evidence from demographic health surveys of 2008, 2013, and 2019.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Effective communication and public engagement strategies to counter misinformation about infectious diseases.Immunology and cell biology · 2026Review
- Empowering communities in cholera outbreak response: Local perspectives from Sidama, Ethiopia.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Harnessing community-based one health interventions implementation beyond Mpox outbreak management in Africa: insights and benefits.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
- Approaches used to monitor the effectiveness of community-led monitoring programmes: a scoping review to inform HIV programmes.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Engagement communautaire et prise en compte de la détresse psychologique, de la peur et de la stigmatisation dans la surveillance et la gestion des épidémies de la maladie à virus Ebola dans l'approche « Une seule santé » en République démocratique du Congo.Global health promotion · 2025Article
- Research and community engagement during the COVID- 19 pandemic in a resource-limited setting: a mixed methods study with epidemic preparedness implications.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Barriers to community engagement during the response to an Ebola virus disease outbreak in Uganda.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Community members' knowledge, attitude, and practices towards Ebola virus prevention in the Western Province of Rwanda.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Effective community engagement in one health research in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.One health outlook · 2025Review
- Scoping review of countries' practices missed by health emergency preparedness and response quantitative tools: COVID-19 and Ebola response experiences.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Situational Judgement Tests among Palestinian community members and Red Crescent volunteers to inform humanitarian action: a cross-sectional study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Community led health promotion to counter stigma and increase trust amongst priority populations: lessons from the 2022-2023 UK mpox outbreak.BMC public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Documentation of structured community engagement initiatives and real-time monitoring of community engagement activities during large-scale epidemics is limited. To inform such initiatives, this paper analyses the Community Led Ebola Action (CLEA) approach implemented through the Social Mobilization Action Consortium (SMAC) during the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone. The SMAC initiative consisted of a network of 2466 community mobilisers, >6000 religious leaders and 42 local radio stations across all 14 districts of Sierra Leone. Community mobilisers were active in nearly 70% of all communities across the country using the CLEA approach to facilitate community analysis, trigger collective action planning and maintain community action plans over time. CLEA was complemented by interactive radio programming and intensified religious leader engagement.Community mobilisers trained in the CLEA approach used participatory methods, comprised of an initial community 'triggering' event, action plan development and weekly follow-ups to monitor progress on identified action items. Mobilisers collected operational and behavioural data on a weekly basis as part of CLEA. We conducted a retrospective analysis of >50 000 weekly reports from approximately 12 000 communities from December 2014 to September 2015. The data showed that 100% of the communities that were engaged had one or more action plans in place. Out of the 63 110 cumulative action points monitored by community mobilisers, 92% were marked as 'in-progress' (85%) or 'achieved' (7%) within 9 months. A qualitative examination of action points revealed that the in-progress status was indicative of the long-term sustainability of most action points (eg, continuous monitoring of visitors into the community) versus one-off action items that were marked as achieved (eg, initial installation of handwashing station). Analysis of behavioural outcomes of the intervention indicate an increase over time in the fraction of reported safe burials and fraction of reported cases referred for medical care within 24 hours of symptom onset in the communities that were engaged.Through CLEA, we have demonstrated how large-scale, coordinated community engagement interventions can be achieved and monitored in real-time during future Ebola epidemics and other similar epidemics. The SMAC initiative provides a practical model for the design, implementation and monitoring of community engagement, integration and coordination of community engagement interventions with other health emergency response pillars, and adaptive strategies for large-scale community-based operational data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.