Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32830123›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2021

Automated detection of early-stage ROP using a deep convolutional neural network.

Yo-Ping Huang, Haobijam Basanta, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang, Kuan-Jen Chen, Yih-Shiou Hwang, Chi-Chun Lai, John P Campbell, Michael F Chiang, Robison Vernon Paul Chan, Shunji Kusaka and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Retinopathy of prematurity screening: A narrative review of current programs, teleophthalmology, and diagnostic support systems.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  18. Performance of deep-learning artificial intelligence algorithms in detecting retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yo-Ping HuangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0429-2007
Haobijam BasantaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Eugene Yu-Chuan KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Kuan-Jen ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yih-Shiou HwangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chi-Chun LaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
John P CampbellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Michael F ChiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Robison Vernon Paul ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Shunji KusakaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Yoko FukushimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Wei-Chi WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan weichi666@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3760-7255

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TED S ACOTT · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY019474 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2010 to 2020
$7.0M
Mentored Vision Clinician-Scientist Program at OHSUK12EY027720 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI David Huang · 2018 to 2026
$2.2M
Clinical and genetic analysis of retinopathy of prematurityR01HD107493 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2021 to 2023
$1.8M
Artificial intelligence assisted panoramic Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY031331 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER, JIAN, YIFAN · 2020 to 2020
$342k
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY027720NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019474NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031331NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD107493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimTo automatically detect and classify the early stages of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN).

methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a referral medical centre in Taiwan. Only premature infants with no ROP, stage 1 ROP or stage 2 ROP were enrolled. Overall, 11 372 retinal fundus images were compiled and split into 10 235 images (90%) for training, 1137 (10%) for validation and 244 for testing. A deep CNN was implemented to classify images according to the ROP stage. Data were collected from December 17, 2013 to May 24, 2019 and analysed from December 2018 to January 2020. The metrics of sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were adopted to evaluate the performance of the algorithm relative to the reference standard diagnosis.

resultsThe model was trained using fivefold cross-validation, yielding an average accuracy of 99.93%±0.03 during training and 92.23%±1.39 during testing. The sensitivity and specificity scores of the model were 96.14%±0.87 and 95.95%±0.48, 91.82%±2.03 and 94.50%±0.71, and 89.81%±1.82 and 98.99%±0.40 when predicting no ROP versus ROP, stage 1 ROP versus no ROP and stage 2 ROP, and stage 2 ROP versus no ROP and stage 1 ROP, respectively.

conclusionsThe proposed system can accurately differentiate among ROP early stages and has the potential to help ophthalmologists classify ROP at an early stage.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBirth WeightCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleGestational AgeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleRetinopathy of PrematurityRetrospective StudiesROC CurveRetinaTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32830123
PMCPMC7900257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.