Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32830109›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2020

Primary care EMR and administrative data linkage in Alberta, Canada: describing the suitability for hypertension surveillance.

Stephanie Garies, Erik Youngson, Boglarka Soos, Brian Forst, Kimberley Duerksen, Donna Manca, Kerry McBrien, Neil Drummond, Hude Quan, Tyler Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A population-based analysis of patterns of care in patients with de novo muscle-invasive bladder cancer from Alberta, Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  3. A population-based analysis of patterns of care in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer from Alberta, Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephanie GariesFamily Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada sgaries@ucalgary.ca.
Erik YoungsonAlberta Strategy for Patient Oriented-Research (SPOR) SUPPORT Unit Data Platform, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Boglarka SoosFamily Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brian ForstFamily Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Kimberley DuerksenFamily Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Donna MancaFamily Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Kerry McBrienFamily Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Neil DrummondFamily Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hude QuanCommunity Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tyler WilliamsonCommunity Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the process for linking electronic medical record (EMR) and administrative data in Alberta and examine the advantages and limitations of utilising linked data for hypertension surveillance.

methodsDe-identified EMR data from 323 primary care providers contributing to the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) in Alberta were used. Mapping files from each contributing provider were generated from their EMR to facilitate linkage to administrative data within the provincial health data warehouse. Deterministic linkage was conducted using valid personal healthcare number (PHN) with age and/or sex. Characteristics of patients and providers in the linked cohort were compared with population-level sources. Criteria used to define hypertension in both sources were examined.

resultsData were successfully linked for 6307 hypertensive patients (96.2% of eligible patients) from 49 contributing providers. Non-linkages from invalid PHN (n=246) occurred more for deceased patients and those with fewer primary care encounters, with differences due to type of EMR and patient EMR status. The linked cohort had more patients who were female, >60 years and residing in rural areas compared to the provincial healthcare registry. Family physicians were more often female and medically trained in Canada compared to all physicians in Alberta. Most patients (>97%) had ≥1 record in the registry, pharmacy, emergency/ambulatory care and claims databases; 44.3% had ≥1 record in the hospital discharge database.

conclusionEMR-administrative data linkage has the potential to enhance hypertension surveillance. The current linkage process in Alberta is limited and subject to selection bias. Processes to address these deficiencies are under way.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalPrimary Health CareSentinel SurveillanceAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAgedAlbertaCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, Familyinformation scienceinformation systemsprimary health carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID32830109
PMCPMC7445345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.