Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32829692›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity: emerging parallels between tissue morphogenesis and cancer metastasis.

Andrew T Plygawko, Shohei Kan, Kyra Campbell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pan-Cancer Analysis of the Prognostic and Immunological Role of SEMA7A.International journal of general medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The evolution of gastrulation morphologies.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew T PlygawkoDepartment of Biomedical Science and Bateson Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Shohei KanDepartment of Biomedical Science and Bateson Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Kyra CampbellDepartment of Biomedical Science and Bateson Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204615/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cells possess epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP), which allows them to shift reversibly between adherent, static and more detached, migratory states. These changes in cell behaviour are driven by the programmes of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), both of which play vital roles during normal development and tissue homeostasis. However, the aberrant activation of these processes can also drive distinct stages of cancer progression, including tumour invasiveness, cell dissemination and metastatic colonization and outgrowth. This review examines emerging common themes underlying EMP during tissue morphogenesis and malignant progression, such as the context dependence of EMT transcription factors, a central role for partial EMTs and the nonlinear relationship between EMT and MET. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Contemporary morphogenesis'.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ProgressionEpithelial CellsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansMorphogenesisNeoplasm Metastasiscancer metastasiscell plasticitycollective migrationepithelial–mesenchymal transitionmesenchymal–epithelial transitiontissue morphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID32829692
PMCPMC7482222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.