Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32829686›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

On folding morphogenesis, a mechanical problem.

Melda Tozluoǧlu, Yanlan Mao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biophysics of lumen morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Mechanics of Building Functional Organs.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Self-assembled active actomyosin gels spontaneously curve and wrinkle similar to biological cells and tissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Signaling in the crowded cell.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Contemporary morphogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melda TozluoǧluMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Yanlan MaoMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U12266BMedical Research Council MR/L009056/1Medical Research Council MR/T031646/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue folding is a fundamental process that sculpts a simple flat epithelium into a complex three-dimensional organ structure. Whether it is the folding of the brain, or the looping of the gut, it has become clear that to generate an invagination or a fold of any form, mechanical asymmetries must exist in the epithelium. These mechanical asymmetries can be generated locally, involving just the invaginating cells and their immediate neighbours, or on a more global tissue-wide scale. Here, we review the different mechanical mechanisms that epithelia have adopted to generate folds, and how the use of precisely defined mathematical models has helped decipher which mechanisms are the key driving forces in different epithelia. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Contemporary morphogenesis'.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo, NonmammalianEpithelial CellsMiceModels, BiologicalXenopusfoldingmathematical modelsmechanicsmorphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID32829686
PMCPMC7482214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.