Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32829680›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Going with the flow: insights from

Alicia G Gubieda, John R Packer, Iolo Squires, Jack Martin, Josana Rodriguez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Delineating the mechanisms and design principles ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  13. Actin filament debranching regulates cell polarity during cell migration and asymmetric cell division.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Contemporary morphogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. PLK-1 Regulation of Asymmetric Cell Division in the EarlyFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alicia G GubiedaBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
John R PackerBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Iolo SquiresBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Jack MartinBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Josana RodriguezBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R019436/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell polarity is the asymmetric distribution of cellular components along a defined axis. Polarity relies on complex signalling networks between conserved patterning proteins, including the PAR (

Indexed as

Cell PolarityActomyosinAnimalsBody PatterningCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionZygoteActomyosinCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasesactomyosin flowasymmetric cell divisioncell polaritycytoplasmic streamingmechanochemical feedbackPAR patterning

Identifiers

PMID32829680
PMCPMC7482210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.