Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32829507›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Finding specificity in structural brain alterations through Bayesian reverse inference.

Franco Cauda, Andrea Nani, Donato Liloia, Jordi Manuello, Enrico Premi, Sergio Duca, Peter T Fox, Tommaso Costa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Franco CaudaGCS-fMRI, Koelliker Hospital and Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Andrea NaniGCS-fMRI, Koelliker Hospital and Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Donato LiloiaGCS-fMRI, Koelliker Hospital and Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Jordi ManuelloGCS-fMRI, Koelliker Hospital and Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Enrico PremiStroke Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Spedali Civili, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Sergio DucaGCS-fMRI, Koelliker Hospital and Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Peter T FoxResearch Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Tommaso CostaGCS-fMRI, Koelliker Hospital and Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0822-862X
University of Turin · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
Meta-analysis in human brain mappingR56MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2020 to 2020
$543k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH074457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of neuroimaging reverse inferences can lead us to suppose the involvement of cognitive processes from certain patterns of brain activity. However, the same reasoning holds if we substitute "brain activity" with "brain alteration" and "cognitive process" with "brain disorder." The fact that different brain disorders exhibit a high degree of overlap in their patterns of structural alterations makes forward inference-based analyses less suitable for identifying brain areas whose alteration is specific to a certain pathology. In the forward inference-based analyses, in fact, it is impossible to distinguish between areas that are altered by the majority of brain disorders and areas that are specifically affected by certain diseases. To address this issue and allow the identification of highly pathology-specific altered areas we used the Bayes' factor technique, which was employed, as a proof of concept, on voxel-based morphometry data of schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. This technique allows to calculate the ratio between the likelihoods of two alternative hypotheses (in our case, that the alteration of the voxel is specific for the brain disorder under scrutiny or that the alteration is not specific). We then performed temporal simulations of the alterations' spread associated with different pathologies. The Bayes' factor values calculated on these simulated data were able to reveal that the areas, which are more specific to a certain disease, are also the ones to be early altered. This study puts forward a new analytical instrument capable of innovating the methodological approach to the investigation of brain pathology.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBayes TheoremDefault Mode NetworkDiagnosis, DifferentialGray MatterHumansModels, TheoreticalNerve NetNeuroimagingProof of Concept StudySchizophreniaalteration specificityAlzheimer's diseaseBayes' factorbrain disorderspainreverse probabilityschizophreniavoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID32829507
PMCPMC7502845
OpenAlexW3080287587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.