ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2020
Design of novel ROCK inhibitors using fragment-based de novo drug design approach.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rho-associated coiled-coil protein kinase (ROCK) is playing a vital role in the regulation of key cellular events and also responsible for causing several pathological conditions such as cancer, hypertension, Alzheimer's, cerebral vasospasm, and cardiac stroke. Therefore, it has attracted us to target ROCK protein as a potential therapeutic target for combating various diseases. Consequently, we investigated the active site of ROCK I protein and designed novel leads against the target using the de novo evolution drug design approach. Caffeic acid (an aglycone of acteoside) as a scaffold and fragments from 336 reported ROCK inhibitors were used for the design of novel leads. Multiple copy simultaneous search docking was used to identify the suitable fragments to be linked with the scaffold. Basic medicinal chemistry rules, coupled with structural insights generated by docking, led to the design of 7a, 8a, 9a, and 10a as potential ROCK I inhibitors. The designed leads showed better binding than the approved drug fasudil and also interacted with the key hinge region residue Met156 of ROCK I. Further, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation revealed that the protein-ligand complexes were stable and maintained the hydrogen bond with Met156 throughout the MD run. The promising in silico outcomes suggest that the designed compounds could be suitable anti-cancer leads that need to be synthesized and tested in various cancer cell lines. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.