Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32828989›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2020

It's all in your head: antifungal immunity in the brain.

Brendan D Snarr, Rebecca A Drummond, Michail S Lionakis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A comprehensive review of neurotropic fungal infections: clinical manifestations and vaccines.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebrospinal fluid: a target of some fungi and an overview.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Fungal Forces in Mental Health: Microbial Meddlers or Function Fixers?Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brendan D SnarrFungal Pathogenesis Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rebecca A DrummondInstitute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, Institute of Microbiology & Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Michail S LionakisFungal Pathogenesis Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: lionakism@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S024611Medical Research Council SBF004/1008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the incidence rate of invasive fungal infections has increased with the use of modern medical interventions, so too has the occurrence of fungi invading the brain. Fungi such as Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus often infect immunocompromised individuals, and can use several strategies to invade the central nervous system (CNS) by penetrating the blood-brain barrier. Once in the brain parenchyma the specialized resident immune cells need to effectively recognize the fungus and mount an appropriate immune response to clear the infection, without causing debilitating immune-mediated toxicity and neuronal damage. Here we review the current knowledge pertaining to the antifungal response of the CNS and highlight areas where future research is required.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain DiseasesFungiHumansImmunityInvasive Fungal Infections

Identifiers

PMID32828989
PMCPMC7438209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.