Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32828985›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2020

Automated thalamic nuclei segmentation using multi-planar cascaded convolutional neural networks.

Mohammad S Majdi, Mahesh B Keerthivasan, Brian K Rutt, Natalie M Zahr, Jeffrey J Rodriguez, Manojkumar Saranathan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A deep learning framework for comprehensive segmentation of deep grey nuclei.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad S MajdiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Mahesh B KeerthivasanDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Siemens Healthcare, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Brian K RuttDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Natalie M ZahrDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Jeffrey J RodriguezDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.
Manojkumar SaranathanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of America. Electronic address: manojsar@radiology.arizona.edu.
Stanford University · USUniversity of Arizona · USBanner - University Medical Center Tucson · USSiemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

Substructural Volumetry of Hippocampus and Thalamus in AlcoholismR21AA023582 · NIAAA · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI SARANATHAN, MANOJKUMAR, ZAHR, NATALIE M · 2015 to 2016
$502k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA023582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a fast and accurate convolutional neural network based method for segmentation of thalamic nuclei.

methodsA cascaded multi-planar scheme with a modified residual U-Net architecture was used to segment thalamic nuclei on conventional and white-matter-nulled (WMn) magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) data. A single network was optimized to work with images from healthy controls and patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and essential tremor (ET), acquired at both 3 T and 7 T field strengths. WMn-MPRAGE images were manually delineated by a trained neuroradiologist using the Morel histological atlas as a guide to generate reference ground truth labels. Dice similarity coefficient and volume similarity index (VSI) were used to evaluate performance. Clinical utility was demonstrated by applying this method to study the effect of MS on thalamic nuclei atrophy.

resultsSegmentation of each thalamus into twelve nuclei was achieved in under a minute. For 7 T WMn-MPRAGE, the proposed method outperforms current state-of-the-art on patients with ET with statistically significant improvements in Dice for five nuclei (increase in the range of 0.05-0.18) and VSI for four nuclei (increase in the range of 0.05-0.19), while performing comparably for healthy and MS subjects. Dice and VSI achieved using 7 T WMn-MPRAGE data are comparable to those using 3 T WMn-MPRAGE data. For conventional MPRAGE, the proposed method shows a statistically significant Dice improvement in the range of 0.14-0.63 over FreeSurfer for all nuclei and disease types. Effect of noise on network performance shows robustness to images with SNR as low as half the baseline SNR. Atrophy of four thalamic nuclei and whole thalamus was observed for MS patients compared to healthy control subjects, after controlling for the effect of parallel imaging, intracranial volume, gender, and age (p < 0.004).

conclusionThe proposed segmentation method is fast, accurate, performs well across disease types and field strengths, and shows great potential for improving our understanding of thalamic nuclei involvement in neurological diseases.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAutomationCase-Control StudiesEssential TremorFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMultiple SclerosisThalamic NucleiYoung AdultClinical analysisConvolutional neural networkThalamic nuclei segmentationWhite-matter-nulled MPRAGE

Identifiers

PMID32828985
PMCPMC7530079
OpenAlexW2995869212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.