Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32828868›Full record

ArticleUrology2020

Feasibility and Safety of Robotic Excision of Ipsilateral Retroperitoneal Recurrence After Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Rashed Ghandour, Andre Filipe Miranda, Nirmish Singla, Xiaosong Meng, Dmitry Enikeev, Solomon Woldu, Aditya Bagrodia, Jeffrey Cadeddu, Jeffrey Gahan, Vitaly Margulis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rashed GhandourDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Andre Filipe MirandaDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Nirmish SinglaDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Xiaosong MengDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Dmitry EnikeevInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Solomon WolduDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Aditya BagrodiaDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jeffrey CadedduDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jeffrey GahanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Vitaly MargulisDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: vmargu@hotmail.com.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine feasibility and safety of robotic excision of local ipsilateral recurrences after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Surgical resection is an option for treatment of low burden locally recurrent RCC, potentially delaying the use of systemic therapy. This has historically been performed by open technique, which can impart significant morbidity. We present our experience with robotic excision.

methodsWe reviewed our institutional experience of patients with surgically excised RCC who underwent robotic excision of ipsilateral retroperitoneal recurrence in 2015-2018. Demographics and clinicopathological variables, including operative and postoperative outcomes, were examined.

resultsTwelve robotic excisions of ipsilateral local recurrences were performed in our hospital in 2015-2018. Mean age was 65.48 years (± standard deviation, SD: 9.51), 10 patients were male, and mean BMI 34.75 kg/m

conclusionIn this small case series, robotic excision of ipsilateral RCC retroperitoneal recurrence appears safe, technically feasible, and oncologically sound in expert hands and carefully selected patients.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Renal CellFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNephrectomyPatient SelectionRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsRetroperitoneal SpaceRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32828868
OpenAlexW3065650729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.