Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32828664›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2021

Quantification of Minimum Detectable Difference in Radiomics Features Across Lesions and CT Imaging Conditions.

Jocelyn Hoye, Justin B Solomon, Thomas J Sauer, Ehsan Samei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jocelyn HoyeCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705. Electronic address: Jocelyn.hoye@duke.edu.
Justin B SolomonClinical Imaging Physics Group, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging, Laboratories Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina.
Thomas J SauerCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 302, Durham, NC 27705.
Ehsan SameiClinical Imaging Physics Group, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Departments of Radiology, Physics, Biomedical Engineering, and Electrical and Computer, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesThe 3-fold purpose of this study was to (1) develop a method to relate measured differences in radiomics features in different computed tomography (CT) scans to one another and to true feature differences; (2) quantify minimum detectable change in radiomics features based on measured radiomics features from pairs of synthesized CT images acquired under variable CT scan settings, and (3) ascertain and inform the recommendations of the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) for nodule volumetry. MATERIALS AND

methodsImages of anthropomorphic lung nodule models were simulated using resolution and noise properties for 297 unique imaging conditions. Nineteen morphology features were calculated from both the segmentation masks derived from the imaged nodules and from ground truth nodules. Analysis was performed to calculate minimum detectable difference of radiomics features as a function of imaging protocols in comparison to QIBA guidelines.

resultsThe minimum detectable differences ranged from 1% to 175% depending on the specific feature and set of imaging protocols. The results showed that QIBA protocol recommendations result in improved minimum detectable difference as compared to the range of possible protocols. The results showed that the minimum detectable differences may be improved from QIBA's current recommendation by further restricting the slice thickness requirement to be between 0.5 mm and 1 mm.

conclusionMinimum detectable differences of radiomics features were quantified for lung nodules across a wide range of possible protocols. The results can be used prospectively to inform decision-making about imaging protocols to provide superior quantification of radiomics features.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPhantoms, ImagingCT-based QuantificationDetectable ChangeLung NodulesMorphologyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID32828664
PMCPMC7895859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.