Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32828275›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2020

CoAsy knockdown in TNBC cell lines resulted in no overt effect on cell proliferation in vitro.

Hamzah A Kharabsheh, John E Scott

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Pathophysiological Role of CoA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamzah A KharabshehDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Biomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise (BRITE), North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: hkharabs@eagles.nccu.edu.
John E ScottDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Biomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise (BRITE), North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: jscott@nccu.edu.
North Carolina Central University · US

Funding

Understanding Perceptions of HIV Risk, PrEP, and PrEP use among African American Women Attending an HBCUU54MD012392 · NIMHD · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI Kevin Peter Williams · 2017 to 2026
$38.1M
Project 2: Identifying and modulating genetic modifiers of GLI1 activation in inflammatory breast cancer.P20CA202924 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, KEVIN PETER · 2016 to 2019
$870k
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA202924NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains the most challenging breast cancer subtype to treat. CoA synthase (CoAsy) is a bifunctional enzyme, encoded by the COASY gene, which catalyzes the last two steps of CoA biosynthesis. COASY has been reported as a hit in several large RNAi library screens for cancer. Therefore, we sought to investigate the dependency of TNBC cell line proliferation on CoAsy expression. Initially, knockdown of CoAsy expression was achieved by RNAi and reduced proliferation was observed in two TNBC cell lines, HCC1806 and MDA-MB-231. To further investigate the role of CoAsy, we established stable inducible shRNA cell lines from the same TNBC cell lines as well as the normal-like breast cell line MCF10A. Three separate cell lines, each expressing one of three different shRNA constructs targeting COASY, and a non-targeted shRNA control cell line were generated from each parent cell line. The induction of COASY shRNA for 4 days resulted in >99% knockdown of CoAsy for all three COASY shRNA constructs. However, this robust knockdown of CoAsy protein expression had no detectable impact on cell growth with 4-day induction times. Even 8-day induction times resulted in no apparent impact on cell growth. There was also no effect of CoAsy knockdown on the rate of cell migration. Measurement of CoA levels in cell lysates indicated that CoAsy knockdown reduced CoA to approximately half the normal level. Thus, CoAsy knockdown showed no detectable effect on the in vitro proliferation and migration of these cell lines possibly due to the cell's ability to maintain adequate levels of CoA through some unknown mechanism.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationCell Line, TumorCell MovementFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansRNA InterferenceTransferasesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsCOASY protein, humanTransferasesCancerCoACOASYCoA synthase

Identifiers

PMID32828275
PMCPMC7465693
OpenAlexW3046678190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.