Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32828221›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2020

UK General Population Utility Values for the SIDECAR-D Instrument Measuring the Impact of Caring for People With Dementia.

Edward J D Webb, David Meads, Hareth Al-Janabi, Paul Kind, Francesca Torelli, Mike Horton, Jan Oyebode, Penny Wright

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edward J D WebbLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK. Electronic address: e.j.d.webb@leeds.ac.uk.
David MeadsLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
Hareth Al-JanabiInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK.
Paul KindLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
Francesca TorelliLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
Mike HortonLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
Jan OyebodeCentre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, England, UK.
Penny WrightLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M025179/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDementia affects many people, with numbers expected to grow as populations age. Many people with dementia receive informal/family/unpaid care, for example, from a spouse or child, which may affect carer quality of life. Measuring the effectiveness of health/social care interventions for carers requires a value measure of the quality-of-life impact of caring. This motivated development of the Scales Measuring the Impact of Dementia on Carers-D (SIDECAR-D) instrument. This study aimed to obtain general population values for SIDECAR-D to aid incorporating the impact of caring in economic evaluation.

methodsMembers of the UK general public completed a best-worst scaling object case survey, which included the 18 SIDECAR-D items and EQ-5D-3L descriptions. Responses were analyzed using scale-adjusted finite mixture models. Relative importance scores (RISs) for the 18 SIDECAR-D items formed the SIDECAR-D relative scale measuring the relative impact of caring. The SIDECAR-D tariff, on the full health = 1, dead = 0 scale, was derived by rescaling EQ-5D-3L and SIDECAR-D RISs so the EQ-5D-3L RISs equaled anchored valuations of the EQ-5D-3L pits state from a visual analog scale task.

resultsFive hundred ten respondents completed the survey. The model had 2 parameter and 3 scale classes. Additive utility decrements of SIDECAR-D items ranged from -0.05 to -0.162. Utility scores range from 0.95 for someone affirming 1 item to -0.297 for someone affirming all 18.

conclusionSIDECAR-D is a needs-based scale of the impact on quality of life of caring for someone with dementia, with a valuation tariff to support its use in economic evaluation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCaregiversCost-Benefit AnalysisDementiaFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdombest-worst scalingcarersdementiaquality of lifevaluationvisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID32828221
PMCPMC7456787
OpenAlexW3043705193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.