Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32828186›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2020

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to rescue sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: a retrospective, multicentre, international cohort study.

Nicolas Bréchot, David Hajage, Antoine Kimmoun, Julien Demiselle, Cara Agerstrand, Santiago Montero, Matthieu Schmidt, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Guillaume Lebreton, Guillaume Hékimian and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PYRIN mActa pharmacologica Sinica · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Refractory septic shock: our updated pragmatic approach.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicolas BréchotService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Collège de France, Centre of Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, CNRS UMR7241, INSERM U1050, Paris, France. Electronic address: nicolas.brechot@aphp.fr.
David HajageSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département Biostatistique Santé Publique et Information Médicale, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Paris, France.
Antoine KimmounService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy and INSERM U1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Julien DemiselleService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers, Angers, France.
Cara AgerstrandDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Medical Centre, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Santiago MonteroService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Acute Cardiovascular Care Unit, Cardiology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Matthieu SchmidtService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
Charles-Edouard LuytService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
Guillaume LebretonService de Chirurgie Cardiaque et Cardiovasculaire, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
Guillaume HékimianService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Erwan FlecherService de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Elie ZogheibCritical Care Department, Amiens University Hospital, Picardy Jules Verne University, Amiens, France.
Bruno LevyService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy and INSERM U1116, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Arthur S SlutskyInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Departments of Medicine, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Daniel BrodieDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Medical Centre, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Pierre AsfarService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Angers, Angers, France.
Alain CombesService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université INSERM-UMRS 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
International ECMO Network
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSorbonne Université · FRSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy with cardiogenic shock have a high mortality. This study assessed venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support for sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock refractory to conventional treatments.

methodsIn this retrospective, multicentre, international cohort study, we compared outcomes of 82 patients (aged ≥18 years) with septic shock who received VA-ECMO at five academic ECMO centres, with 130 controls (not receiving ECMO) obtained from three large databases of septic shock. All patients had severe myocardial dysfunction (cardiac index 3 L/min per m

findingsAt baseline, patients treated with VA-ECMO had more severe myocardial dysfunction (mean cardiac index 1·5 L/min per m

interpretationPatients with severe sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO had a large and significant improvement in survival compared with controls not receiving ECMO. However, despite the careful propensity-weighted analysis, we cannot rule out unmeasured confounders.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesShock, CardiogenicShock, SepticTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32828186
OpenAlexW3053240236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.