Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32827306›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2021

Approach selection and outcomes of craniopharyngioma resection: a single-institute study.

Cao Lei, Li Chuzhong, Liu Chunhui, Zhao Peng, Bai Jiwei, Wang Xinsheng, Zhang Yazhuo, Gui Songbai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Global pediatric craniopharyngioma management modalities and outcomes.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Enhanced outcomes in residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma: evaluating combined gamma knife and phosphorus-32 brachytherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: evolution in the management.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cao LeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Li ChuzhongBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Liu ChunhuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Zhao PengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Bai JiweiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Wang XinshengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Zhang YazhuoBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Gui SongbaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China. guisongbai@yeah.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-2018

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Z19110700660000Capital Health Research and Development of Special 2020-4-1077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since there are many approaches for successful craniopharyngioma resection, how to choose a suitable approach remains problematic. The aim of this study was to summarize experience of approach selection and outcomes of craniopharyngioma resection in our institute. The data of 182 primary craniopharyngiomas between January 2013 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Craniopharyngiomas were classified into intrasellar, intra-suprasellar, suprasellar, and intra-third ventricle types based on the location. The surgical approaches, extent of resection, endocrine and ophthalmological outcomes, and complications were evaluated. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 158 (86.8%) patients, near-total resection (NTR) in 20 (11%), and partial resection (PR) in 4 (2.2%). New-onset hypopituitarism occurred in 90 (49.5%) and new-onset diabetes insipidus in 48 (26.4%). Visual function was improved in 110 of the 182 patients, unchanged in 52, and deteriorated in 20. For intra-suprasellar and suprasellar tumors, patients in the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) group had higher GTR rate, lower incidence of new-onset hypopituitarism, and better visual outcome than patients in transcranial approach group, but no significant difference in the incidence of new-onset diabetes insipidus was found. There were no surgery-related deaths, and the common complications included permanent oculomotor nerve palsy, hemorrhage, and cerebrospinal fluid leaks. During the follow-up period, tumor recurrence or regrowth occurred in 6.6% of the cases. Tumor location is key for choosing an optimal surgical approach for craniopharyngioma resection. The EEA should be considered as the first choice for intra-suprasellar and suprasellar craniopharyngiomas to achieve better visual outcomes and fewer pituitary hormonal disorders.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCerebrospinal Fluid LeakChildChild, PreschoolCraniopharyngiomaFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeuroendoscopyPituitary NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeClassificationCraniopharyngiomaEndoscopic endonasal approachOutcomeTranscranial approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.