Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32827272›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2020

Non-Pharmacologic Management of Splenomegaly for Patients with Myelofibrosis: Is There Any Role for Splenectomy or Splenic Radiation in 2020?

Kamya Sankar, Kristen Pettit

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New approaches to tackle cytopenic myelofibrosis.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamya SankarDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, C300 Med Inn, SPC 5848, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5848, USA.
Kristen PettitDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5848, USA. krpettit@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMyelofibrosis is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm which can lead to massive splenomegaly. Currently approved medical therapies do not improve splenomegaly in all patients and effects are not sustained. Thus, spleen-directed therapies (i.e., splenectomy and splenic irradiation) have been used in some cases to palliate the signs and symptoms of the disease. Here, we critically review the literature regarding palliative splenectomy and splenic irradiation in myelofibrosis, and discuss their position in the current treatment landscape. RECENT

findingsRetrospective studies have demonstrated that splenectomy improves symptoms of splenomegaly, decreases complications of portal hypertension, and decreases transfusion dependence. However, it carries a significant peri-operative and long-term morbidity and mortality rate. Splenic irradiation reduces splenic size but is limited by duration of response and myelosuppression. Spleen-directed therapies in myelofibrosis may be considered for refractory symptoms and complications of massive splenomegaly after carefully weighing the associated risks, though overall survival may not be impacted. Development of medical therapies that target and reverse the underlying disease pathophysiology is required in order to have a significant impact on the natural history of the disease process.

Indexed as

Palliative CareSplenectomyHumansPrimary MyelofibrosisRadiotherapySplenomegalyTreatment OutcomeMyelofibrosisSplenectomySplenic irradiationSplenomegaly

Identifiers

PMID32827272
OpenAlexW3080670152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.